Many Horses: A Personal Experience with National Board Certification and Creative Thinking

By Kerr, Lynda C. | Art Education, January 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Many Horses: A Personal Experience with National Board Certification and Creative Thinking


Kerr, Lynda C., Art Education


Horses of varying conformations and colors step across our view in a display of energy and forward motion in Rosa Bonheur's 1855 painting, The Horse Fair. The painting is a metaphor for my experience with National Board Certification. The process led me to critique and display my teaching practice, to generate multiple solutions as varied as Bonheur's horses, and to move my professional development forward.

In 1994, the first 81 teachers completed the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS) certification process. The National Board was created in response to the 1983 report, A Nation at Risk, which gave a grim prognosis for the American education system. The report spurred the Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy to create the Task Force on Teaching as a Profession in 1986. This task force was made up of five educators, four business leaders, two scientists, and two lawmakers. In 1987, the task force released their report, A Nation Prepared: Teacher's for the 21st Century. This report outlined a plan aimed at retaining and rewarding accomplished teachers through a system of advanced certification. The task force called on the teaching profession to set the standards and award certification for teachers who met those standards. The group that was assembled to meet this challenge, The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards, describes itself as an independent, nonprofit, nonpartisan and non-government organization.1

National Board Certification is intended to indicate that "a teacher is judged by his or her peers as one who is accomplished, makes sound professional judgments about students' best interests, and acts effectively on those judgments" (National Board for Professional Teaching Standards website, 2003). Because the National Board Certification process is based on standards, some educators fear it will lead to conformity and standardization in teaching (Martusewicz & Reynolds, 1994, p. 231). In 1999, as the first Georgia art teacher to achieve National Board Certification, I found the opposite to be true. For me, the process fostered divergent thinking and opened the door to more creative teaching.

The standards for National Board Certification aim to "identify the specific knowledge, skills, and dispositions that support accomplished practice, while emphasizing the holistic nature of teaching; show how a teacher's professional judgment is reflected in observable actions; and describe how the standards come to life in different settings" (National Board for Professional Teaching Standards website, 2003). These standards represent the work of many contributors. The standards were drafted and are periodically updated by a committee of 15 members, most of whom are actively engaged in teaching students in their field.2 The NBPTS selects committee members from a nationwide search to represent a diversity of perspectives (National Board for Professional Teaching Standards website, 2003). Standards for a field are developed over 12-18 months. After the committee approves the draft, it is published and made available on the Web for public comment for 8 weeks. Following the public comment period, the committee meets to review the comments and make further revisions. Next, teachers who volunteer to complete the portfolio as a pilot project test the draft. Final revisions are then made.

Standards and Criteria

As more emphasis is placed on standards, some educators worry that originality, imagination, and teacherstudent relationships will be crowded out of the school day. Education writer Susan Ohanian (1999) is critical of the standards movement, citing how it limits human individuality and its forced uniformity. She points out that standards proponents-"standardistes"-allow for no flexibility in teaching; no tailoring of the curriculum for the unique student. "Standardistes don't offer a rich garden of delight; instead they want us to cut down the meddlesome Spanish moss of curriculum, replacing it with astroturf, which knows how to keep its place" (Ohanian, 1999, p.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Many Horses: A Personal Experience with National Board Certification and Creative Thinking
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?