Evaluating British Railway Poster Advertising: The London & North Eastern Railway between the Wars

By Watts, D. C. H. | The Journal of Transport History, September 2004 | Go to article overview

Evaluating British Railway Poster Advertising: The London & North Eastern Railway between the Wars


Watts, D. C. H., The Journal of Transport History


This article interprets sixteen inter-war pictorial railway advertising posters and evaluates their likely effectiveness as marketing tools for increasing train travel. In doing so, it seeks to contribute to our understanding of how pre-nationalisation railway companies functioned as businesses and how they represented themselves to the public. No records were found that would enable the posters' effectiveness to be measured; the most abundant source materials are the posters themselves, and a qualitative analysis of their content, carefully contextualised, forms the basis of this evaluation.

Using posters as source material presented challenges of selection and interpretation. Their survival has depended partly on chance and, as prenationalisation railway companies appear not to have kept details of each one they produced, it has not been possible to obtain a representative sample. So an alternative selection process was used. The posters evaluated here were produced between 1923 and 1939. Modern marketing techniques began to be used in the 1920s, justifying the use of modern criteria against which to evaluate them.1 Similar reasoning underlies the choice of posters produced by the London & North Eastern Railway (LNER). Soon after its creation in 1921 the LNER 'established a reputation for producing exciting and innovative work . . . [and] set a standard in poster design that none of its rivals could match'.2 The company also demonstrated continuity in poster advertising policy: both its inter-war advertising managers, William Teasdale and Cecil Dandridge, valued the medium and contributed to debate over its development.' Thus the LNER seemed the most likely pre-nationalisation railway company to produce effective advertising posters. The posters evaluated all advertise Yorkshire, although not all do so exclusively. In observing the choice of locations from this county's considerable landscape variety4 - and it was the LNER's advertising manager who made that choice5 - surviving posters should indicate the sort of traveller being targeted. Those advertising specific localities were avoided to ensure that the LNER was in sole charge of their production. Railway companies often marketed towns jointly with councils6 and, although the LNER was probably the dominant partner in such agreements,7 the possibility of council influence on design or choice of artist cannot be discounted. Lastly, to keep the sample manageable, analysis was restricted to posters available at the National Railway Museum (NRM) depicting inland Yorkshire (Figures 1-16).

The second challenge is that there is no single, widely accepted technique for interpreting visual imagery.8 Most studies of posters have adopted what might be termed a 'commonsense' interpretive approach (i.e. one based on figurative conventions), situated within the context of art and design history.9 The problem with conventions, such as those that enable us to 'read' visual images, is that they naturalise social constructions.10 This can make them difficult to interrogate critically. To paraphrase Rodney Barker, the commonplace is the greatest defence against change - not what is considered essential, but what is considered obvious.11 It is necessary, therefore, to engage with the processes of the construction of visual meaning and the power relations that influence them.12 Several studies of post-1945 advertising imagery do this," but most studies of railway posters do not.14

The interpretive method employed here uses Umberto Eco's interpretation of Peircean semiotics as a way of understanding the construction of visual meaning." Semiotics may be defined broadly as the study of how meanings are made. It is, in Eco's terms, the study of sign functions.16 A sign function is a relationship, based on substitution, between a signifier (which stands for) and a signified (which is stood for). The process by which sign functions are created, that is, by which a particular signifier is linked to a particular signified, is called semiosis.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Evaluating British Railway Poster Advertising: The London & North Eastern Railway between the Wars
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.