Does Anyone Care about Elementary Social Studies?: Dilemmas of Teaching Elementary Social Studies Methods within a High Stakes Testing Context

By Yendol-Hoppey, Diane; Tilford, Keith | Social Studies Review, Fall 2004 | Go to article overview

Does Anyone Care about Elementary Social Studies?: Dilemmas of Teaching Elementary Social Studies Methods within a High Stakes Testing Context


Yendol-Hoppey, Diane, Tilford, Keith, Social Studies Review


The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001 required states to set more ambitious improvement goals for student learning in reading, writing, and mathematics with corresponding sanctions for schools who do not meet the stated goals. These goals have been translated into summative assessments that have increased the stakes for student, teachers, schools, and school districts across the nation. As a result, many states have decided not to include social studies in their battery of summative assessments and, as a result, in some elementary classrooms social studies has disappeared from the school curriculum.

Abrams & Madaus (2003) suggested that policymakers who insist on linking test scores to high-stakes consequences for students and schools often overlook lessons already learned. Over a decade ago, Madaus (1988) described seven principles that captured the intended and unintended consequences of high stakes assessment. Based on the literature reviewed, when important decisions are made based on test results, teachers teach to the test which narrows the curriculum to reflect what is tested. The literature indicated that high stakes consequences forced teachers to give more attention to testing content and to decrease the emphasis placed on untested content (i.e., social studies).

To date, although 34 states do test social studies (Buckles, Schug, & Watts, 2001), Florida remains a state where the social studies curriculum is not tested. This issue becomes a particularly pressing dilemma for teachers in Florida as state-mandated curriculum frameworks that emphasize standardized testing in the areas of reading, writing, and mathematics increasingly endure at the expense of the non-tested social studies curriculum. Consistent with the research of the 1980s, elementary schools in Florida that face pressures of "raising their school grade" have clearly shifted their curricular attention away from social studies and social studies has become a second and less significant tier of the elementary curriculum.

This shift away from teaching social studies in the elementary school becomes particularly problematic as calls for connecting theory and practice come from almost every organized educational policy group (i.e., Holmes, NCATE). These groups advocate the coupling of methods courses with field experiences and developing closer ties with K-12 education through the cultivation of school/university partnerships often referred to as Professional Development Schools (Holmes, 1986). These schools are places where simultaneous renewal occurs for all stakeholders and theory and practice are seen as merging for prospective teachers to witness. Given the current context of high stakes testing reshaping the educational terrain, teacher educators need to understand the vehicles that facilitate or inhibit the teaching of elementary social studies within the schools where these field experiences take place.

FINDING THE "SPACE" FOR TEACHING ELEMENTARY SOCIAL STUDIES

In our professional development school in central Florida, both practicing and prospective teachers voiced substantial frustration in teaching and learning to teach the untested subject of social studies. For example, Robert, a teacher in one of our partnership schools, described a field trip that he routinely conducted with his 51'1 grade students before his district shifted personnel and support away from social studies:

We use to have a mock court that we went to that was connected to our study of the judicial system and the Bill of Rights. We would go to the Court House each year and local attorneys would work with the 5th grade students. The attorneys, judges, law students, and others would hold a mock court for the kids. The kids were selected to sit on the jury and there were one or two scenarios that they would use and go through the trial process. They had direct examination, cross examination, witnesses, to see how the court system worked in our country and the kids or jury would go back and deliberate and come back with a verdict. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Does Anyone Care about Elementary Social Studies?: Dilemmas of Teaching Elementary Social Studies Methods within a High Stakes Testing Context
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.