Decisions of the Supreme Court's 2003 Term: State Sovereign Immunity, Disparate Impact and Reverse Age Discrimination

By Corbett, William R.; Maraist, Frank L. et al. | Labor Law Journal, Winter 2004 | Go to article overview

Decisions of the Supreme Court's 2003 Term: State Sovereign Immunity, Disparate Impact and Reverse Age Discrimination


Corbett, William R., Maraist, Frank L., Drummonds, Henry H., McCann, Laurie, Travis, Michelle, Labor Law Journal


Throughout the year, CCH asks recognized experts in the field of labor and employment law to discuss decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court in the labor and employment arena. CCH welcomes the opportunity to share their observations with readers of the Labor Law Journal.

TENNESSEE v. LANE

In May, the Supreme Court ruled that "as it applies to the class of cases implicating the fundamental right of access to the courts," Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA),1 which prohibits discrimination against the disabled by public entities in the provision of public services, is a valid exercise of Congress' enforcement power under section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment.2 In so holding, the Court allowed two paraplegics to sue the State of Tennessee for money damages for allegedly denying them access to the state court system because of their disabilities.

Background

The decision is one in a line of cases where the Court has considered the Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity argument in the context of a number of federal laws, most recently those prohibiting discrimination. In Kimel u Florida Board of Regents,3 and Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett,4 the Court held that the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA)5 and Title I (employment provisions) of the ADA,'' respectively, were not valid abrogations of the states' sovereign immunity from suits by private individuals for money damages. In Nevada Dept. of Human Resources v. Hibbs,1 however, the Court held that the Family and Medical Leave Act's provision of 12 weeks of leave to care for a family member with a serious health condition8 was a valid exercise of Congress' power to remedy sex discrimination under section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. In Hibbs, Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justice O'Connor "jumped ship" to join Justices Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer and Souter to comprise the majority. In Lane, Justice O'Connor joined Justices Stevens (who wrote the opinion), Souter, Ginsburg and Breyer. Justices Rehnquist, Thomas, Scalia and Kennedy dissented.

Liability for money damages. At the outset, it is important to be clear that what we are talking about in these sovereign immunity eases is the states' immunity from money damages liability, law Professor Henry Drummonds stressed. "We are not talking about the power of Congress to enact legislation proscribing discrimination, or broadly defining discrimination to reach acts not proscribed by the Constitution itself, or the power to make such legislation applicable to state and local governments, although you sometimes see commentary that confuses this," he explained.

Even where the Supreme Court has upheld state claims of sovereign immunity-in Garrett, for example-the statutes remain in theory substantively binding on the states and fully enforceable in actions for prospective or injunctive relief, Drummonds emphasized.

Court's analysis

Two paraplegics who use wheelchairs for mobility-Lane, the subject of criminal charges, and Jones, a court stenographer-sued the state alleging that they had been denied access to the state court system because of their disabilities. The district court denied the state's motion to dismiss. The Sixth Circuit affirmed, explaining that the claims were not barred because they were based on due process principles.9

Congruence and proportionality. Applying its now familiar "congruence and proportionality test," the Court noted that in addition to remedying irrational disability discrimination, Title TI of the ADA also seeks to enforce other basic constitutional guarantees, such as the right of access to the courts that is protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and infringements of which are subject to "more searching judicial review."

Citing Justice Broyer's dissenting opinion in Garrett, cataloging hundreds of instances of unequal treatment of persons with disabilities by the states and their political subdivisions, the Court pointed out that the record of constitutional violations in Lane "far exceeded" the record in Hibbs. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Decisions of the Supreme Court's 2003 Term: State Sovereign Immunity, Disparate Impact and Reverse Age Discrimination
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.