The Judicial Independence and Accountability Task Force

Judicature, November/December 2004 | Go to article overview

The Judicial Independence and Accountability Task Force


AJS' watchdog seeks to maintain the delicate balance between independence and accountability which permits our system of justice to function effectively.

Because of their importance to its mission to promote the effective administration of justice, the American Judicature Society has always been attentive to the complementary concepts of judicial independence and judicial accountability. As reflected in recent Judicature editorials, tension among the branches of government at the federal level and in many states, already high, continues to increase. Subtle (and not so subtle) threats have been directed at the judiciary, both at the state and the federal levels. At the same time, some judges and courts seem to have forgotten that, in a system of separated but interdependent powers, restraint and dialogue are essential if cruder instruments of accountability are to be avoided.

Concerned about this state of affairs and its potential impact on the administration of justice, early this year AJS created a Judicial Independence and Accountability Task Force. The Task Force is chaired by Stephen Burbank, a longtime AJS Board member and David Berger Professor for the Administration of Justice at the University of Pennsylvania Law School. Its diverse membership includes judges, law professors, practicing lawyers and lay people, all of whom believe in the importance of preserving a system of justice that, although imperfect, is justly regarded as one of this country's finest achievements. The Task Force has three goals: to monitor events bearing on judicial independence and accountability at the federal and state levels; to respond to unwarranted attacks on the judiciary and to highly visible situations demonstrating a failure of judicial accountability; and to educate the public on the relevant issues.

The Task Force has chosen initially to monitor seven issues bearing on judicial independence and accountability:

* The Feeney Amendment and other federal and state restrictions on judicial discretion in sentencing;

* The investigation of Chief Judge James Rosenbaum of the District of Minnesota and other similar legislative initiatives under the banner of "oversight";

* Pending and threatened action in states that would limit or eliminate the courts' rule-making authority;

* The ability of federal judges to consider comparative and international legal materials in determining the content of domestic legal rules;

* The federal judicial discipline process;

* The use of recess appointments of federal judges; and

* The use (and threatened use) of jurisdiction stripping statutes to reduce federal judicial power.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Judicial Independence and Accountability Task Force
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.