Harmonization of Investment Valuation Standards in Europe

By Eriksson, Clare; Adair, Alastair et al. | Journal of Real Estate Literature, January 1, 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Harmonization of Investment Valuation Standards in Europe

Eriksson, Clare, Adair, Alastair, McGreal, Stanley, Webb, James R., Journal of Real Estate Literature


The harmonization of valuation standards in Europe is attracting increasing interest from several sources, but little empirical research has been undertaken on the subject. This study reports the findings of an investigation across four European countries. The focus is placed upon arguments relating to the possible implementation of harmonized standards, a comparison of national standards and an evaluation of The European Group of Valuation Associations (TEGOVA) standards. The findings show that the harmonization of valuation standards has been limited by lack of awareness and the reluctance of valuers to use standards other than their own national standards. The importance of the harmonization process is discussed along with the need for TEGOVA to take a more proactive role of promoting the use of common standards.


Land and buildings are amongst the most important assets of a country. The Economic Intelligence Unit (1997) has emphasized that real estate forms an increasingly significant part of cross border direct investment. It is in the public interest, and in the interest of valuers and appraisers that the pricing of real estate is carried out reliably, consistently and transparently throughout the world. Lack of knowledge of valuation techniques can represent a barrier to entering markets as appraisal of real estate represents a key component in the assessment of risk. Business expansion across borders creates the need for consistent valuation systems for accounting purposes. This is recognized by the introduction of unified rules for the valuation of insurance company portfolios enabling meaningful cross-border comparison of performance (Downie, 1995).

Valuers and financial reporters are bound by their professional bodies to work within the standards that apply in their jurisdiction. In this respect, standard setting is a dynamic international process. The function of the valuation standard is to establish a foundation for sound practice to ensure compliance within the financial reporting regulatory framework. It is the valuation standard setters' role to debate technical and consequential issues, both within the valuation industry and the wider financial environment. As users of property valuations become increasingly international, there is a growing need for the harmonization of valuation practice and internationally accepted valuation standards.

Although studies exist that concentrate on valuation standards and practices in individual countries (Bruhl, 1997; Downie, 1995; and Downie, Adair, McGreal and Vos, 1996) very little analysis has been carried out comparing these issues on a cross national basis within Europe using a common set of research tools to investigate each country. This study attempts to bridge the knowledge gap and in particular to analyze the extent to which the harmonization of valuation standards has developed within France, Germany, Sweden and the Netherlands by focusing on three key issues. First, valuer awareness and the perceived importance of the harmonization debate are discussed. second, the factors acting as a stimulus for and against the harmonization of valuation standards in Europe are analyzed. Third, possible implications of adopting The European Group of Valuation Associations (TEGOVA, 2000) standards are examined, in particular their ability to overcome valuation variation and whether they should replace existing national standards. The research questions at the heart of these issues are assessment of the drivers for change and the extent to which national valuers pay cognizance to the TEGOVA standards.

Harmonization of Standards

In the real estate discipline, Diaz (2000) considers that less information is known than is currently required. This contention is particularly pertinent to the harmonization of valuation standards in Europe despite the importance of this process. This debate originated with the publication of the Approved European Valuation Standards, originally known as the 'Guide Bleu' or the Blue book and the role of valuation standards within national contexts has been the subsequent focus of a number of studies (Dunckley, 2000; Brühl, 2002; and Thorne, 2002).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Harmonization of Investment Valuation Standards in Europe


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?