Ask the Adr Professionals

Judicature, January/February 2005 | Go to article overview

Ask the Adr Professionals


News You Can Use from the National Arbitration Forum

I know that appeals of an arbitrator's decision are limited. What are the parameters?

Arbitration is thought to be an effective legal alternative and its dual benefits of affordability and efficiency are well documented. Those benefits are derived, at least in part, by the finality of the arbitrator's decision. Grounds for judicial review of arbitration decisions, in turn, are typically limited as set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"), similar state statutes, and the common law "manifest disregard" standard of review.

Congress enacted the FAA against a backdrop of hostility to arbitration in which "unlimited review" of an arbitration decisions was often the norm.

The FAA's standards in 9 U.S.C. §10 (a) for vacating an arbitrator's decision are narrow. On a motion by the non-prevailing party, the FAA provides that a court may vacate an arbitration award and, at its discretion, order a rehearing only in circumstances where (1) the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means; (2) there was evident partiality or corruption in the arbitrators; (3) the arbitrators were guilty of misconduct or misbehavior by which the rights of any party were prejudiced; or (4) the arbitrators exceeded their powers.

Years later, the U.S. Supreme Court created an additional standard of review for vacating arbitration awards-manifest disregard of the law. In other words, even where the arbitrator did not exceed the power granted by the contract, a result could be so egregious that a court would not let it stand.

Commentators argue that these narrow grounds of review are part of arbitration's appeal-providing a shorter framework for decisions, coupled with limited appeal rights, reduces arbitration's cost to a fraction of the cost of litigation.

May parties contract for greater judicial review of an arbitrator's decision?

While limitations on judicial review provide real benefits to some contracting parties, some parties wish to expand the "default" scope of review set forth in the FAA and similar state laws.

To date, courts have split on whether parties may expand judicial review of arbitration decisions otherwise available under the FAA. Some commentators have argued that "broadening" the FAA's vacatur standards by contractual agreement is consistent with the fundamental objective of the FAA, ensuring enforcement of parties' arbitral agreements. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Ask the Adr Professionals
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.