The Miracle of Jury Reform in New York

By Levine, James P.; Zeidman, Steven | Judicature, January/February 2005 | Go to article overview

The Miracle of Jury Reform in New York


Levine, James P., Zeidman, Steven, Judicature


Against all odds, numerous initiatives were successfully put into place to accomplish two goals-democratizing jury service and easing juror burdens.

Accepted wisdom has it that reforming courts is like moving mountains-a Herculean task that is well-nigh impossible. The reasons are many: court atitonomy, deep-seated traditions, lethargy, cynicism, institutional fragmentation, vested interests, and just plain ineptitude. Political scientist Malcolm Feeley, after studying many unsuccessful attempts to change the functioning of courts, concluded with the following despairing words:

Scholar are finding that many innovative programs fail in their implementation. This book suggests that the picture is bleaker; the causes of failure are found at every stage of planned change. Often failure is rooted in conception, in a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature ol the problem, the dynamics of the system, the nature of the change process, and attention to detail at the service delivery level.1

It is thus truly remarkable that New York State was able to radically transform its jury system in the space of a decade. Against all odds, an abundance of initiatives were successfully put into place to accomplish two goals-democratizing jury service and easing juror burdens. We call this dramatic reconstruction of a jury system that had resisted change for a century the miracle of jury reform.2

This article analyzes how such monumental change was accomplished. Six major participants in the process were interviewed at length: Judith Kaye (Chief Judge of New York Slate), Jonathan Lippman (Chief Administrative Judge of New York State), Colleen McMahon (Federal District Court Judge and the former chair of a judicially appointed commission charged with reviewing jury service in the state and making recommendations for improvement), Judge James Lack (former chair of the New York State Senate Judiciary Committee), Chester Mount, Jr. (Director of Research and Technology, New York State Unified Court System, Office of Court Administration), and Anthony Manisero (Manager, Statewide Jury Support, New York State Unified Court System, Office of Court Administration). We also had an exchange of correspondence with Marc Bloustein, counsel for the New York State Office of Court Administration. These interviews were supplemented by a search of media coverage of the jury reform process and review of reports prepared by the courts.

The reforms

A number of reforms were put into place to expand the pool of available jurors. Master source lists were expanded and improved to include public assistance and unemployment compensation rolls.3 Special postal service lists on changes of address were incorporated into databases of prospective jurors. An automated system was put into place to help go after those ignoring jury summonses. A list of "permanently qualified" jurors, which resulted in the same individuals being called repeatedly, was abolished. Perhaps most significant of all, legislation granting automatic exemptions to 20 occupations, including pharmacists, embalmers, lawyers (including judges), and police officers, which had resulted in the removal from jury service of more than a million people statewide, was repealed.

To reduce the burden of jury service, a number of conveniences and amenities were implemented. All persons summoned to service on a particular date were given the unqualified opportunity to receive one automatic postponement to a date of their choosing within six months by utilizing a computerized telephone system. Courthouse facilities were upgraded: more telephones were installed; inspections and cleaning of bathrooms were regularized; public address systems were updated. Assistance and information given to jurors were enhanced: a new juror orientation video narrated by well-known newscasters was created; a juror handbook was published, including a statement of jurors' rights and responsibilities, as well as a glossary of legal terms; a juror newsletter (Jury Pool News), with lively stories and even a crossword puzzle, was developed to help jurors endure the boredom of waiting periods; and a juror hotline accessible by a toll-free number was put into place to field complaints and answer questions about jury service. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Miracle of Jury Reform in New York
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.