Private Care and Public Waiting

By Duckett, Stephen J. | Australian Health Review, February 2005 | Go to article overview

Private Care and Public Waiting


Duckett, Stephen J., Australian Health Review


Abstract

Waiting time for public hospital care is a regular matter for political debate One political response has been to suggest that expanding private sector activity will reduce public waiting times. This paper tests the hypothesis that increased private activity in the health system is associated with reduced waiting times using secondary analysis of hospital activity data for 2001-02.

Median waiting time is shown to be inversely related to the proportion of public patients.

Policymakers should therefore be cautious about assuming that additional support for the private sector will take pressure off the public sector and reduce waiting times for public patients.

Aust Health Rev 2005: 29(1): 87-93

ALTHOUGH MEDICARE HAS ELIMINATED financial barriers to access to hospital care, the existence of hospital waiting lists indicates that there are other barriers to access. Fifty per cent of patients requiring elective surgery in public hospitals in Australia in 2001-02 waited more than 27 days, and in the ACT the median wait was 40 days. Ten per cent of patients waited more than 203 days, with 10% of patients in Tasmania waiting almost one year.1 Waiting time for access to public hospital care is a significant political issue and a matter of concern to voters in Australia and, indeed, in most OECD countries.2

Strategies to reduce excessive waiting times need to be carefully designed to avoid creating perverse incentives to reward hospitals with long lists or waiting times.3 Contemporary supply-side strategies, which assume that current surgery rates are too low, include increasing funding; increasing productivity (through changing incentives, payment arrangements, or day-surgery rates); improving management of waiting lists; creating specialist elective surgery centres; use of private sector facilities; or transferring patients to facilities with lower demand or shorter waiting times. Demand-side strategies include use of explicit guidelines; and reducing pressure on public services by encouraging use of private services.2 Waiting list reduction strategies such as these have been shown to work and it should not be assumed that waiting lists are intractable or that demand is infinite.4

The most prominent demand-side strategy in Australia has been the introduction of a 30% health insurance rebate which, it was argued, would take the "burden off the public hospital system".5 Other policies to promote private health insurance have included the introduction of life time community rating, which led to an increase in private health insurance prevalence of around 50% to a current level of 43%.6 The rebate costs around $2.5 billion per annum, money which might be better spent on assisting public hospitals directly.7

One of the justifications for the 30% health insurance rebate is that the rebate encourages people to take out health insurance, thus facilitating access to private hospital care, which in turn reduces demand on the public sector and, presumably, eventually leads to reduced waiting times. When the rebate was introduced, a government advertising campaign encouraged people to take out private insurance with visual images of the beds of the privately insured racing past those waiting for public hospital treatment.

However, household survey data from the United Kingdom confirms that longer public waiting lists in the local health authority are associated with higher take-up of private health insurance.8 A comprehensive systems dynamic simulation confirmed the link between increasing waiting lists and private activity growth.9 Time series analysis of United Kingdom national data found that a 1% increase in a waiting time variable (measured as cost of waiting) was associated with a 0.6% increase in demand for private care.10

There are clearly significant interactions between the public and private markets, not least that the surgeons who operate on public palients are often the same surgeons who operate on private patients, and so an interaction between private practice and public activity should be expected. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Private Care and Public Waiting
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.