Re-Orienting Australia-China Relations: 1972 to the Present

By Klintworth, Gary | The China Journal, January 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Re-Orienting Australia-China Relations: 1972 to the Present

Klintworth, Gary, The China Journal

Re-Orienting Australia-China Relations: 1972 to the Present, edited by Nicholas Thomas. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004. xiv + 292 pp. US$89.95/£50.00 (hardcover).

This is a useful book for anybody interested in the background and recent history of Australia-China relations. However, the title Re-Orienting Australia-China Relations belies the contents of some of the chapters, which do not address that issue of "re-orienting". This is a predictable outcome when twelve scholars are asked to contribute to an edited volume. Integration of twelve chapters into a polished whole requires very clear guidelines from the start and/or a ruthless editor at the finish.

The first chapter by Colin Mackerras is a useful summary of Australia-China relations between 1972 and 2002. The chapter on Australia's relations with Taiwan by Bruce Jacobs is well-written and meticulously footnoted. Jacobs tries to track and explain the reasons that changes occurred in Australia's relations with Taiwan. But we are still left wondering how Australia's relationship with China might have been re-oriented in the context of Australia-Taiwan relations over the last thirty years. William Tow's chapter on the geopolitical context of Australia-China relations, especially the conundrums posed for Australia's core relationship with the US, is insightful. However, some points need qualification, for example, the claim that China is "unwilling to fully embrace Australia's 'Asianness' as long as Australia remains firmly Western in its fundamental geopolitical orientation and remains closely tied to the United States" (p. 51). Very few Australians-or Chinese-seriously think of Australia as Asian or part of Asia. On the contrary, China (and Taiwan) value relations with Australia because it is English-speaking, Westernized, industrialized, influential in Washington and London and, yes, Australian.

The chapter by Liz Pitts on Australian-Chinese subnational government relations presents thorough research on the myriad linkages that have been established in China by agencies and institutions outside the central governments. The chapter might have been developed further to address questions (reflecting the thrust of the book's title) as to why there has been a proliferation of such linkages and what they signify about the direction of Australia-China relations. Pitts asks that a central body be set up, perhaps in Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, to catalogue and synchronize these linkages. That's sensible.

The next chapter, "Australia and China in the World Trade Organization", by Brett Williams, is excellent. It is well written, informative, detailed, well-footnoted and logical. In his concluding remarks, he relates the chapter to the changes that have taken place in Australia-China relations from 1972 to the present.

Jane Orton's chapter on Australia-China relations in business presents the fruits of original though narrow research (often in undigested slabs). Surprisingly, her starting point is 1993-94. Her vision of her topic differed from the editor's, because there is a noticeable absence of comment on whether and why these business perspectives have been re-oriented over the last decade. The chapter following analyzes the statistics, content and comparative trends in business, trade, investment and economic linkages between Australia and China. This chapter, too, ought to have assessed the re-orientation of the relationship over the period 1972-2002.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Re-Orienting Australia-China Relations: 1972 to the Present


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?