The Merit Pay Debate

By Mitchell, Russ | Chief Executive (U.S.), April 2005 | Go to article overview

The Merit Pay Debate


Mitchell, Russ, Chief Executive (U.S.)


Merit pay? No way. That's the stance taken by teachers' unions against linking performance and pay. Through strength in numbers and political organization, combined with the public's general fondness for teachers, the unions have long prevailed.

But this year could be different. A ballot initiative backed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is all but certain to go to California voters by November. The measure would establish merit pay in the state's constitution and ban seniority as a consideration in teacher employment decisions, including hiring, firing, transfers and pay. In addition, the initiative would extend from two to five the number of years required for a teacher to qualify for tenure.

For the hundreds of thousands of unionized teachers in California, the stakes are enormous. Schwarzenegger has openly stated his intention to leverage his personal popularity to push the ballot initiative and break what he sees as a stranglehold by state employee unions over the legislature.

Union leaders promise to drop a heavy hammer on the governor's merit-pay plan. "The governor will have his money, and education will have its money," says John Ferez, until recently head of the United Teachers Los Angeles union. "The entire education community is going to oppose him. The governor will find that voting against teachers and against kids is not popular."

The governor's once sky-high popularity has taken a steep dive, his overall approval rating dropping from 65 percent to 55 since last fall, according to the Field Poll. Still, support for the meritpay initiative was recently polling at a strong 60 percent.

Both the governor and state Education Secretary Richard Riordan, the former Los Angeles mayor, are racing around the state pushing hard for the merit pay plan. In an interview, Riordan repeated his observation that teaching is the only profession in which pay is completely disconnected from job performance. "If I ran a restaurant," he says, "and I decided to pay everyone the same, every waiter, every cook, no matter what kind of job they do, and I'm not ever going to fire anybody -well, I'm going to go bankrupt."

The unions offer plenty of reasons why pay based on merit won't work. Competition among teachers would make for tension in the schools and have detrimental effects on the students, they say. Performance reviews would be arbitrary, principals would play favorites, and without more money merit pay is a zerosum game, where even average teachers would fall behind as districts struggle to pay high achievers more. Furthermore, they say, no one has proven that merit pay makes for better teachers.

Almost everyone agrees on one thing: California public schools are among the worst in the nation. Average scores in reading and math on national assessment tests from 1990 to 2003 put California 48th out of 50 states, ahead of only Louisiana and Mississippi. Meantime, per-pupil K-12 spending in California totaled $7,692 in 2003-2004, 25th highest in the country, though factoring in the state's high cost of living pushes the figure comparatively lower.

How would teachers be judged under the California scheme? The amendment's language requires both employee evaluations and evidence of improvements in student academic achievement as measured by standardized tests. Further details, including how to weigh the two factors, are left to the local school boards. The unions are opposed to "subjective" supervisory evaluations and to tying a teacher's pay to student test scores.

The school boards don't have many models to guide them. Merit pay plans in states such as Texas and Tennessee flopped, partly because the plans involved paying teachers more money, an idea that didn't survive state budget crises.

There are a few promising merit pay examples. The Milken Family Foundation, based in Santa Monica, has sponsored experiments in merit pay around the country, including in Arizona and South Carolina. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Merit Pay Debate
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.