Please update your browser

You're using a version of Internet Explorer that isn't supported by Questia.
To get a better experience, go to one of these sites and get the latest
version of your preferred browser:

Estimating the Cost of Preserving Private Lands in Florida: An Hedonic Analysis

By Larkin, Sherry L.; Alavalapati, Janaki R. et al. | Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, April 2005 | Go to article overview

Estimating the Cost of Preserving Private Lands in Florida: An Hedonic Analysis


Larkin, Sherry L., Alavalapati, Janaki R., Shrestha, Ram K., Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics


Florida's open-space land-acquisition program is one of most aggressive in the country, with $3.7 billion paid for 3.8 million acres since 1972. Using data from the Conservation and Recreational Lands (CARL) program, hedonic analyses found that acquiring private lands with valuable natural resources, habitat for rare species, and important historical sites for public preservation is more costly. Development potential and pressure also increased acquisition costs. The presence of additional endangered natural elements and needing to contract with additional landowners, however, were found to decrease the cost. Results provide a basis for landowners and land-acquisition agencies to negotiate.

Key Words: development pressure, Florida Forever, hedonic prices, implicit land values, land conversion. Preservation 2000

JEL Classification: Q24

Loss of rural farm and forestlands in the face of urban sprawl is a growing concern in the United States. This concern is, perhaps, more serious in Florida because it has the largest net domestic migration in the nation (U.S. Census Bureau). In addition, population growth in Florida during the 1990s (23.5%) and population density (296.4 per square mile) are both well above the national averages of 13.1% and 79.6 per square mile, respectively (U.S. Census Bureau). As human populations expand, water resources can become strained or polluted, crucial wildlife habitats may be threatened, and sensitive ecosystems may become fragmented. One method of limiting urban development, conserving open space, and ensuring ecosystem services is by purchasing private lands.

In Florida, a statewide public land-acquisition program was established by the Florida Legislature in 1972. This program focused on the purchase of environmentally endangered lands and continued through 1978, when it was expanded to include conservation lands. The revised program, the Conservation and Recreational Lands (CARL) program, continues today. Lands are acquired under the CARL program for conservation and protection of open spaces, unique natural areas, endangered species, unusual geologic features, wetlands, and historical sites. Since 1990, the CARL program has funded the purchase of over one million acres. By comparison, the Nature Conservancy has protected 15 million acres nationwide since the 1950s. In 2000, funding for the CARL program was extended until 2010.

The economic value of environmentally sensitive lands and open spaces is difficult to quantify because, in most cases, no active market or comparable sales records are available. Even if such data were available, the private values may not incorporate the public value of the land (Loomis, Rameker, and Seidl). However, the opportunity of cost of preserving environmentally sensitive lands and the effect of land attributes and other environmental features on the cost of preservation can be determined using a hedonic analysis. To date, hedonic price analyses of open-space lands have been conducted using data from individual transactions of undeveloped or nearby lands (e.g., agricultural lands or residential home sales) and with aggregated data from the census (e.g., at the county level) (Mendelsohn, Nordhaus, and Shaw; Plantinga and Miller). This technique estimates the implicit value of land attributes important for farming, environmental amenities, aesthetics, and recreation (Espey and Owusu-Edusei; Irwin; Lansford and Jones; Loomis, Rameker, and Seidl; Mahan, Polasky, and Adams; Nickerson and Lynch; Plantinga and Miller; Poor et al.; Tyrvainen and Miettinen). Many of these studies also estimated the implicit price associated with pressure to develop the land (Lansford and Jones; Mahan, Polasky, and Adams; Nickerson and Lynch; Plantinga and Miller; Tyrvâinen and Miettinen). In general, findings have revealed that the type and size of open space are important determinants of the price paid for the land.

Despite the successful application of the hedonic technique to determine values for open-space environmental amenities based on sales of agricultural lands or nearby residential homes, there is little empirical investigation on the cost of public preservation of private lands.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Estimating the Cost of Preserving Private Lands in Florida: An Hedonic Analysis
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.