Abundance of Green Tree Frogs and Insects in Artificial Canopy Gaps in a Bottomland Hardwood Forest

By Horn, Scott; Hanula, James L. et al. | The American Midland Naturalist, April 2005 | Go to article overview

Abundance of Green Tree Frogs and Insects in Artificial Canopy Gaps in a Bottomland Hardwood Forest


Horn, Scott, Hanula, James L., Ulyshen, Michael D., Kilgo, John C., The American Midland Naturalist


ABSTRACT.-

We found more green tree frogs (Hyla cinerea) in canopy gaps than in closed canopy forest. Of the 331 green tree frogs observed, 88% were in canopy gaps. Likewise, higher numbers and biomasses of insects were captured in the open gap habitat. Flies were the most commonly collected insect group accounting for 54% of the total capture. These data suggest that one reason green tree frogs were more abundant in canopy gaps was the increased availability of prey and that small canopy gaps provide early successional habitats that are beneficial to green tree frog populations.

INTRODUCTION

Southeastern bottomland forests serve as an important source of hardwood timber, as well as critical habitat for many wildlife species. Land-clearing for agriculture since the colonization of North America has resulted in a large reduction of these wetland habitats (Dahl, 1990) and current projections estimate that, by the year 2030, hardwood timber removal will increase by 64% over 1984 levels (USDA Forest Service, 1988). Therefore, it is imperative to understand these ecosystems and to develop sustainable practices that retain the full complement of species associated with bottomland hardwoods while still generating timber revenue. Currently, clearcutting is the most common method of harvesting and regenerating bottomland forests (Clatterbuck and Meadows, 1993). It remains a valuable silvicultural practice for efficient removal of trees and provides habitat for many early successional wildlife species (Costello et al, 2000). Despite the benefits of this even-aged method, public concerns have risen about the use of clearcntting (Guldin, 1996), so alternatives are needed.

Group-selection harvesting is an uneven-aged method used to mimic small-scale disturbances within forests. This practice may be advantageous in an ecosystem management approach (Guldin, 1996). These smaller disturbances are thought to encourage species diversity by increasing sunlight, minimizing competitive exclusion and creating habitat heterogeneity (Connell, 1978; Hartshorn, 1978; Denslow, 1980; Uhl and Murphy, 1981; Sousa, 1984; Brokaw, 1985; Shure and Phillips, 1991). Changes in plant diversity and abundance are followed by corresponding changes in insect communities (Gorham et al., 1996; Waltz and Whitham, 1997). For example, Walters and Stiles (1996) found pollinator visitation rates were greater in forest canopy gaps compared to surrounding closed canopy forests. Similarly, studies have shown carabid beetle diversity and abundance increased in disturbed areas (Thompson and Alien, 1993; Beaudry et al., 1997; Heliola et al., 2001; Koivula et al., 2002; Warriner et al., 2002).

Like arthropods, many vertebrates are known to take advantage of the resources available in newly created canopy gaps. Several studies have noted certain species of birds use canopy gaps, both natural (Wilson el al., 1982; Blake and Hoppes, 1986; Martin and Karr, 1986; Schemske and Brokaw, 1981; Wunderle el al., 1987; Levey, 1988) and artificial (Kilgo et al., 1999; Moorman and Guynn, 2001), more than closed canopy forest. It is likely that populations of reptiles and amphibians are affected by group-selection harvests as well. Amphibians are an important part of most southeastern communities (Bennett et al, 1980) and are widely considered to be good indicators of environmental health and function (Phelps and Lancia, 1995). Because of their importance within ecosystems, several studies have sought to determine how forest management affects their populations. Clearcutting is a major factor altering herpetofaunal communities (Enge and Marion, 1986; Pough et al, 1987; Petranka et al, 1993; Phelps and Lancia, 1995), but Greenberg (2001) found that gaps created by wind disturbance in the southern Appalachians had little effect on terrestrial amphibian abundance relative to the surrounding intact forest.

Few studies have examined how forest management affects species such as the green tree frog (Hyla cinered) that spend little time on the ground. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Abundance of Green Tree Frogs and Insects in Artificial Canopy Gaps in a Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.