Survival and Growth of Northern Bobwhite Chicks in Western Oklahoma

By Lusk, Jeffrey J.; Guthery, Fred S. et al. | The American Midland Naturalist, April 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Survival and Growth of Northern Bobwhite Chicks in Western Oklahoma


Lusk, Jeffrey J., Guthery, Fred S., Cox, Scott A., Demaso, Stephen J., Peoples, Alan D., The American Midland Naturalist


ABSTRACT.-

Knowledge of chick ecology is essential for understanding and managing populations of northern bobwhites (Colinus virginianus). We report on chick survival and growth in western Oklahoma during 1997-2002. We used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate chick survival rate. Covariates included mass at time of capture, Julian day of capture and year. Chick mass was the only significant covariate in the model. Survival depended on time since capture because survival increased with chick mass, which concomitantly increased with time since hatch. Because of the dependence of survival on chick mass, we modeled chick growth as a function of age using a logistic model (r^sup 2^ = 0.98). Growth-rate was highest at day 35 post-hatch, which was around the mean capture-to-death survival time for chicks (30.0 ± 4.4 d SE). Our results suggest that the 30-35-d period post-hatching is a critical period in chicks' lives.

INTRODUCTION

The number of bobwhites in the autumn population is the sum of the number of adults and juveniles surviving through the breeding season. To date, adult survival has received the most research attention, and the survival rate of chicks is among the least investigated aspects of bobwhite ecology (Roseberry and Klimstra, 1984; Guthery, 2002). Knowledge of the demography of bobwhite chicks during the first few weeks of life is essential for understanding fluctuations in autumn populations.

For short-lived species such as the bobwhite, population growth rate is most sensitive to changes in fecundity (Lebreton and Clobert, 1991) and, in as much as it is related to fecundity, recruitment. For bobwhites, 66% of the variation in recruitment was explained by the number of chicks hatched per hen (fecundity) (Klimstra and Roseberry, 1975). Increasing juvenile mortality by 45% (from 15 to 60% mortality) had a 2.greater impact on recruitment than a 60% increase (from 20 to 80% mortality) in adult mortality (Roseberry, 1974). Roseberry and Klimstra (1984) suggested that, because of this relationship between fecundity and recruitment, juvenile survival might play a secondary role in determining autumn population size. However, the effect of juvenile survival on recruitment and autumn population size is still considerable; Roseberry (1974) reported that fecundity and juvenile survival were equally important to recruitment.

Further, such information will provide wildlife managers with a better understanding of the ecology of the bobwhite. Our objectives were to model chick survival rates as a function of mass at capture, Julian day of capture and year. We used radiotelemetry to track individually marked chicks during 1997-2002. This allowed us to follow survival of chicks past the brood-rearing stage. We modeled survival using a Cox proportional hazards model. Given our best survival model, we then modeled the growth rate of bobwhite chicks as a function of time since hatch to better understand the relationship between mass and survival rate through time. We also derived an estimator of hatch-to-November survival of chicks that was independent of telemetry data; this was done to check telemetry-based survival estimates, which are usually biased low for bobwhites (Guthery and Lusk, 2004).

METHODS

Study area.-This study was part of a long-term ( 1991-2002) research program conducted on the Packsaddle Wildlife Management Area in southern Ellis County, 40 km north of Cheyenne, Oklahoma. The Packsaddle encompassed 6475 ha of mixed-grass prairie. DeMaso et al. (1997; and references therein) provided a detailed description of the Packsaddle.

Capture and telemetry.-This study was initiated in 1997 as an extension of the work done by DeMaso et al. (1997). However, rather than estimate chick survival by following radiomarked adults, we monitored radiomarked chicks continuously during 1997-2002 until death, disappearance or entrance into the adult population. Nests, found by following radiomarked adults, were monitored to determine hatch date, and chicks were caught 1-5 d after hatching.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Survival and Growth of Northern Bobwhite Chicks in Western Oklahoma
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?