Terrorism and World Politics

By Halliday, Fred | The World Today, May 2005 | Go to article overview

Terrorism and World Politics


Halliday, Fred, The World Today


BEYOND ARMED RESPONSE

The first anniversary of the Madrid train bombing has passed with ceremonies to commemorate the killing of over 190 people. The fourth anniversary of the attack by Al Qaeda on the United States is approaching. The question of when, and why, these attacks began is important to understand the challenge, but it is also time to ask questions about how the struggle with terrorism is going and what the prospects are.

IT WAS THE FIRST TIME IN FIVE HUNDRED YEARS A THIRD World force hit massively at a city in the metropolitan north, and more than ten years since the wave of strikes on western targets, with the 1993 attempt on the World Trade Centre, and subsequent attacks in Saudi Arabia in 1995 and east Africa three years later.

While it is never possible to judge with confidence, let alone certainty, any military conflict, conventional or not, during hostilities, states and independent observers need to form some provisional judgement on the kind of warfare being waged and the consequences.

Many questions about terrorism need careful, open-minded and critical discussion. All the talk of Al Qaeda as a product of the Muslim or Arab mind misses the point. It is a product of something more immediate, and in which the west played a significant part: the Cold War. It was the reckless commitment by western states, particularly the US and Britain, to support the mujahidin in Afghanistan in the 1980s that brought this group into existence.

The first essential step in defining the conflict is to assess the nature of the challenge. Much is made in western rhetoric about the irrational, fanatical, barbaric character of Al Qaeda and its associates. All this is true, as a moral judgement and an expression, shared many Muslims, of abhorrence at what the organisation has done. But it omits the equally important question, that of explanation.

Here moral outrage, and generic denunciations of 'Arab' or 'Muslim' extremism, do not help. The core issue is one of politics and political calculations. The causes of this movement lie in politics, in rejection of western policies in west Asia and of the states allied with the west, rather than in economic deprivation or the effects of globalisation. And the goals of the movement are political, above all to seize power in a range of states, from Saudi Arabia to Pakistan. To adapt the early nineteenth century strategist von Clausewitz on war, terrorism is the continuation of politics by other means.

The foot soldiers and suicide bombers who carry out operations may well be fanatics, but the people who direct them, as with other terrorist groups, are calculating and political. Theirs is a vision that stretches over years, if not decades. They are seeking above all to seize control of a number of countries now aligned with the US and Europe.

This political logic explains the object, and timing, of the attacks. September 11 2001 was aimed not to destroy or seriously weaken the US, but to mobilise support for Al Qaeda and its allies in the Muslim world. The Madrid bombing on March 11 last year, on the other hand, was intended to affect the politics of Spain by altering the outcome of the election and punishing a government involved in the western occupation of Iraq.

Attacks in developing countries are designed to highlight the vulnerability of American and western power, be this in bombings of US embassies in East Africa, killing of tourists in Bali, or attacks on shipping in Yemeni territorial waters. The wave of incidents in Saudi Arabia over the past eighteen months have had a similar political, and related economic, logic, to undermine the confidence of western companies and contractors in Saudi Arabia, whose economic performance depends on their continued presence, and to expose the reliance of the ruling family on western assistance.

The question then arises of how this conflict has developed, whether the beginning is judged to have been 2001, or 1993.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Terrorism and World Politics
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.