Critical Thinking in Distance Education and Traditional Education

By Visser, Lya; Visser, Yusra Laila et al. | Quarterly Review of Distance Education, Winter 2003 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Critical Thinking in Distance Education and Traditional Education

Visser, Lya, Visser, Yusra Laila, Schlosser, Charles, Quarterly Review of Distance Education


The authors of this paper see critical thinking as a disciplined manner of thought (Scriven & Paul, 2000) that a person uses to assess the validity of something (statements, stories, arguments, research, etc.). The behaviors or habits of mind associated with critical thinking include asking questions, defining a problem, examining evidence, analyzing assumptions and biases, avoiding over-simplification, reflecting on other interpretations, and tolerating ambiguity (Facione, 1998). Critical thinking requires a deep understanding of the issues being investigated. However, critical thinking also requires flexibility-the willingness to change one's point of view as a result of examining and re-examining ideas and facts that may seem obvious. Critical thinking not only takes time and effort, it also requires a certain attitude toward the self and the outside world-willingness to say the three words that are often not so easy to use: "I don't know."

The role of critical thinking and discourse in education has been recognized through the centuries. In fact, it was Socrates who, through discourse, challenged his students to become critical thinkers by formulating and asking questions and by developing a thorough and profound understanding of the issues they were studying (Facione, 1998). Indeed, it was already evident in Socratic times that discourse-the dissemination and exchange of information to negotiate understanding and generate new knowledge-was a central mechanism for the development of critical thinking skills. Critical thinking underlies reading, writing, speaking, and listening (the basic elements of communication).

When discussing critical thinking and discourse, we assume that these play an important role in all levels of education, and particularly in graduate-level education. It is assumed that critical thinking and discourse should create new understandings among learners. Being able to think critically is vital, as it allows one to adapt to a changing environment (Facione, 1998). In education, critical thinking can be viewed as a learning outcome, but it can also be viewed as a mediating mechanism for the attainment of other learning outcomes (Fisher, 2001).

What Do We Know About the State of Critical Thinking in Higher Education?

In considering the extent of integration of critical thinking and discourse in higher education, the seminal question to consider is: Are we, as students and instructors (as reflective practitioners and as lifelong learners) helping our students to become critical thinkers? This question formed the basis of a research study carried out in 66 California universities (both public and private). In the study (Paul, Elder, & Bartell, 1997), the researchers assessed current teaching practices and investigated the knowledge of critical thinking among faculty, while also identifying exemplary practices in teaching critical thinking. The findings from this study are somewhat sobering. Among other things, it was found that while almost 90% of the instructors claimed that critical thinking was the primary objective of their instruction, only 19% of the instructors could give a clear explanation of critical thinking. Furthermore, the study found that basic concepts essential to understanding critical thinking were poorly understood by faculty participating in the study. For example, only 9% of faculty could clearly differentiate between an assumption and an inference; and only 4% could differentiate between an inference and an implication. In addition, it was found that while 67% of the participating faculty said that their concept of critical thinking is largely explicit in their thinking, only 19% could elaborate on their concept of critical thinking. In other words, there was a certain degree of overconfidence among participating faculty in terms of the extent of their understanding of the concept of critical thinking.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Critical Thinking in Distance Education and Traditional Education


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?