The Risen Jesus and Future Hope

By Parrish, Stephen E. | Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, March 2005 | Go to article overview

The Risen Jesus and Future Hope


Parrish, Stephen E., Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society


The Risen Jesus and Future Hope. By Gary R. Habermas. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003, 239 pp., $25.00 paper.

The subject of the resurrection is of perennial importance for both theology and apologetics. It is at the heart of the Christian faith, and by being so has inevitably been the subject of many works, including works of apologetics. This is true on both a scholarly and a popular level, as is witnessed by recent works such as N. T. Wright's The Resurrection of the Son of God and Lee Strobel's The Case for Easter.

One scholar who has devoted a large part of his career to the topic of the resurrection is Gary Habermas. I am unaware of anyone who has made a deeper study of the bodily resurrection of Jesus than Habermas or done more to defend its historicity. In this most recent work, he again defends the truth of the resurrection and draws out some of its implications. He uses the full resources of his learning on the subject but writes in a style readily available to the layperson.

The book is divided into two broad sections: the first, "A Resurrection Faith," is divided into six chapters; the second, "The Resurrection and some Practical Issues," consists of four chapters. Habermas's purpose is threefold: apologetic, in that he defends the historical truth of the risen Jesus; theological, in that he explains the meaning of the resurrection; and practical, in that he draws out what the resurrection should entail in the life of a Christian.

The first chapter covers the resurrection of Jesus as a historical event. Habermas employs the defense of the historicity of the resurrection that he has developed and used in many books and debates. The essence of his approach is to use only those facts whose historical reliability enjoys almost universal agreement among scholars. Using these core facts Habermas develops his case that the resurrection of Jesus must have occurred as an event in history because only the bodily resurrection can explain the facts.

Another important part of his apologetic methodology is that Habermas details the bankruptcy of naturalistic theories. These theories attempt to show that the core facts can be reasonably explained without believing that Jesus did indeed rise from the dead. However, according to Habermas, all of these theories contain multiple flaws and should be rejected on historical grounds; indeed, twentieth-century naturalistic theories have been rejected by almost every scholar.

In his second chapter, "A Theistic Universe," Habermas argues that there are weighty arguments for God's existence and briefly examines four of them: (1) the epistemic argument that knowledge cannot be justified in naturalism; (2) the Kalam cosmological argument that the universe had a beginning in time and therefore must have been caused to come into existence by God; (3) the argument that there is too much information and specified complexity in the universe and especially living things to be accounted for without design; and (4) near death experiences. Some of these arguments have various versions; for example, Habermas lists three versions of the epistemic argument. He does not claim too much for these arguments, stating rather that these and other arguments make a strong cumulative case for theism and (especially) against naturalism. For example, the last argument from near-death experiences is really more of an argument against naturalism and physicalism than it is for theism: Granting that there is empirical evidence for human survival after death does not necessarily lead to theism, and Habermas does not claim that it does; rather, his limited point is that such evidence does undermine theism's main philosophic rival.

In the final pages of the chapter, Habermas argues that the philosophical case against either the existence or knowability of miracles fails. For example, he attacks the concept of the antecedent improbability of miracles, the notion that miracles are so a priori improbable that realistically there could never be enough evidence to justifiably believe in even one miracle. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Risen Jesus and Future Hope
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.