AMS Dates from Four Late Prehistoric Period Rock Art Sites in West Central Montana

By Scott, Sara A.; Davis, Carl M. et al. | Plains Anthropologist, February 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

AMS Dates from Four Late Prehistoric Period Rock Art Sites in West Central Montana


Scott, Sara A., Davis, Carl M., Steelman, Karen L., Rowe, Marvin W., Guilderson, Tom, Plains Anthropologist


In 2002, eight pigment samples were collected from three rock art sites in the Big Belt Mountains of west central Montana. Samples from Hellgate Gulch (24BW9), Avalanche Mouth (24BW19), and the Gates of the Mountains (24LC27) were dated using plasma-chemical extraction and accelerator mass spectrometry. The dates were statistically indistinguishable with ages of 1170 ± 45, 1225 ± 50, and 1280 ±50 B.P. When calibrated, these ages range from 650 to 990 cal A.D. This corresponds to the early Late Prehistoric period on the Northwestern Plains. An oxalate accretion sample overlying a painted area at another site, Big Log Gulch (24LC1707), provided a minimum age of 1440 ± 45 B.P. for the rock art present at this site. The dated images at the four sites fit within the Foothills Abstract and Eastern Columbia Plateau rock art traditions.

Keywords: rock art, plasma-chemical extraction, radiocarbon dating, Foothills Abstract tradition, Eastern Columbia Plateau tradition

Since 1997, the Helena National Forest has maintained an active rock art research and conservation program in the Big Belt Mountains of west central Montana (Greer and Greer 1997, 2001; Loubser 2001a, 2002,2004; Scott and Davis 2004; Scott et al. 2000). Natural deterioration, vandalism and increased site visitation necessitated the development of conservation plans and accurate baseline data for monitoring and law enforcement purposes. Two of the largest Big Belts rock art sites in Hellgate Gulch (24BW9) and the Gates of the Mountains (24LC27) are now recorded in detail, and graffiti has been removed from the Hellgate Gulch site to discourage future vandalism (Loubser 2001a; Scott et al. 2000). A large forest fire in the north Big Belts in 2000 precipitated post-fire erosion control at the Hellgate Gulch pictographs (Davis 2001; Scott et al. 2000), rock art survey in the burn area (Greer and Greer 2001), and site condition assessments (Loubser 2001a). The accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) dating project with Texas A&M University and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory described in this paper is a continuation of this rock art investigation program.

Only a few attempts have been made to date central Montana rock art using AMS radiocarbon dating (Greer 1995: 48-50; Loendorf 1992). Paint pigment seriation has therefore been used to establish a relative chronology for central Montana rock art, which spans from 3000 B.C. to A.D. 1000 (Greer 1995). The notable absence of Ceremonial tradition and Biographic tradition rock art images also indicates that many central Montana rock art sites pre-date A.D. 1000. Although these are useful temporal reference points, radiocarbon dates are necessary to build an accurate rock art chronology.

Rock art condition assessments completed by Loubser (2001a, 2002) identified images at four sites that were in deteriorated condition and flaking from the rock face. In 2002, small flakes of paint pigment exfoliating from the panels at these select sites were carefully collected for AMS radiocarbon dating. An oxalate accretion sample overlying a red pigment smear was also collected from the Big Log Gulch Pictograph site (24LC1707). In an effort to be sensitive to potential tribal and rock art conservation concerns, samples were not removed from intact (non-exfoliating) images, although such sampling may have provided finer temporal and stylistic resolution to this study.

ROCK ART CONTEXT AND SAMPLE SITES

The Big Belt Mountains lie just east of the Continental Divide on what is roughly the boundary between the Eastern Columbia Plateau and the Northwestern Plains. The majority of pictograph sites in the Big Belts (and surrounding mountain ranges) are characteristic of the Foothills Abstract rock art tradition (Keyser and Klassen 2001:151-175). This tradition, which may have originated in the Middle Plains Archaic period, is characterized by extensive red pigment washes with superimposed images composed of elongated (stick-like) human figures, zoomorphs, handprints, smears, fmgerlines, maze and mask-like figures, and geometric designs.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

AMS Dates from Four Late Prehistoric Period Rock Art Sites in West Central Montana
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?