Kids & Media in America/Parental Control of Television Broadcasting/Children, Teens, Families, and Mass Media: The Millennial Generation/The Window in the Corner: A Half-Century of Children's Television

By Steele, Jeanne Rogge | Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, Spring 2005 | Go to article overview

Kids & Media in America/Parental Control of Television Broadcasting/Children, Teens, Families, and Mass Media: The Millennial Generation/The Window in the Corner: A Half-Century of Children's Television


Steele, Jeanne Rogge, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly


Kids & Media in America. Donald F. Roberts and Ulla G. Foehr. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 380 pp. $75 hbk. $25 pbk.

Parental Control of Television Broadcasting. Monroe E. Price and Stefaan G. Verhulst, eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002. $79.95 hbk. $39.95 pbk.

Children, Teens, Families, and Mass Media: The Millennial Generation. Rose M. Kundanis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003. $45 hbk. $22.50 pbk.

The Window in the Corner: A Half-Century of Children's Television. Ruth Inglis. London: Peter Owen Publishers, 2003. $27.95 pbk.

In the preface to her delightfully readable history of children's television, journalist Ruth Inglis observes that "no specific person is perfectly suited" to chart the evolution of children's television since its inception in the 1950s. The same might be said about books about young people's media and the various theories and policies related to their production, content, and effects. No specific book can do it all; these topics are far too complex. Nevertheless, like Inglis' Window in the Corner, each of the books reviewed here opens a window on certain aspects of the discussions that swirl up and around young people's media, particularly television. One theme that unites the grouping of titles is the long-held belief that adults-the producers, profiteers, and would-be controllers of media content made for youthful consumption-are responsible for ensuring that such content do no harm and ideally do some good. Price and Verhulst state the concern this way: "The protection of minors from harmful content is a matter of strong public interest. Children, and not only the very young, are more vulnerable to influence than adults and, in the modern world, do not always have the guidance of their parents."

This modern world is particularly challenging for today's parents and policymakers because of the rapidly changing media landscape. Whereas children in the 1950s had at most five or six television channels to choose from, a handful of local radio stations that played their kind of music, and one or two movie theaters within walking or driving distance, today's youth can select from hundreds of media sources from literally all over the world. The sheer volume of content available is mind boggling, and access is not limited to the home. Young people can take their preferred media with them to school, a friend's house, or the mall. Thanks to digital technology, the fidelity of the sights and sounds that travel with them in cars, on bikes or skateboards, and on airplanes can be startling. Media are like the air children and teens breathe; they are their surroundings.

Few people would argue with the principle that children should be protected from harm or that it takes more than parents alone to guarantee such protection. However, building consensus about what constitutes harmful media content, or harmful media for that matter, is an exceedingly difficult task. And, even if consensus were reached about what is good and what is bad for children, one could argue that neither content nor media technology per se is harmful. Rather, it is how children and teens use the media and media content that matters.

At a simplistic level, the key question is this: how does media content get into the hearts and minds of children and teens? What kind of bridge links analog and digital sights and sounds to children's and adolescents' biological and neurological receptors? These are big questions-too big for most media research studies. Not surprisingly, they are left unanswered in these books. Still, each book offers answers to related questions of considerable importance, albeit of narrower scope.

Roberts, a Stanford University professor who has taught and written about youth and media for more than thirty years, and co-author Foehr, a Ph.D. candidate at Stanford when their book was published, report on a major survey conducted by the Kaiser Family Foundation. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Kids & Media in America/Parental Control of Television Broadcasting/Children, Teens, Families, and Mass Media: The Millennial Generation/The Window in the Corner: A Half-Century of Children's Television
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.