Ethics in Natural Resources Management: Some Concepts and Food for Thought1

By Fox, John D., Jr. | NACTA Journal, June 2005 | Go to article overview

Ethics in Natural Resources Management: Some Concepts and Food for Thought1


Fox, John D., Jr., NACTA Journal


Abstract

The objective in this paper is to highlight a few concepts and approaches from the discipline of ethics that might serve as food for thought when students are wrestling with controversial natural resource issues and ethical behavior as natural resource professionals. Overall, this discussion advocates critical reflection, empirical inquiry, and intellectual honesty with particular attention paid to the interrelationship between science and ethics. I suspect not all will agree with everything I suggest, but, as in the classroom, my purpose is to stimulate thought and dialogue and share experiences. First, I present some foundational concepts followed by a simplified summary of classical approaches to ethics. I then briefly discuss the field of environmental ethics and caution against the unclear use of language and fallacious thinking. Finally, I advocate a common-sense interpretation of the precautionary principle and a clear distinction between means and ends.

Introduction

A desirable objective in preparing students for success in the controversial and contentious realm of natural resources management is to instill the intellectual virtues of critical reflection, empirical inquiry, and intellectual honesty. This is consistent with an overall curricular goal of producing technically competent and ethically responsible professionals (see Wilson, 1999 for details on these intellectual virtues). The ethical domain has become a focus of general education or "core" degree requirements at many colleges and universities, as well as a dimension of some accreditation standards (Society of American Foresters, 2003; ABET, Inc., 2004). As individual instructors trained in specific natural science or social science disciplines, how can we provide guidance for discussing the ethical aspects of natural resources management? The objective of this paper is to highlight a few concepts and approaches from the discipline of ethics that might encourage these intellectual virtues and serve as a useful framework when wrestling with natural resource issues in academic and professional settings. I am particularly going to focus on the relationship between science and ethics.

Likely most students can rattle off the basic steps of the scientific method; it is less likely they are familiar with any systematic approach to ethical analysis. In response to the perennial student question "Who's to say what's right and wrong?" Pojman (2002) answers "those who can provide the best reasons." Tom Regan (1983, p.126-135) offers at least a set of conditions conducive to making ideal moral judgments: conceptual clarity, information, rationality, impartiality, coolness, and reference to a valid moral principle. Even in the teaching of science, students may need to be reminded that knowledge is advanced by empirically testing and refuting hypotheses and not by conducting opinion polls (Popper, 1934). Furthermore, science is conducted by fallible human beings and therefore operates under an implied set of ethical standards (National Academy of Sciences, 2003; for a critical view of how science can get off track see Crichton, 2003a). In what follows I attempt to provide for students and practitioners of natural resources management a useful context and framework for ethical discussion.

Useful Concepts

Science and ethics are very much interdependent fields of human endeavor. Ethics without science is at best uninformed and at worst delusive, while science without ethics is at best suspect and at worst downright dangerous. Perhaps the clearest principle regarding the relationship between science and ethics is "ought" implies "can." "Stop continental drift" cannot be an ethical mandate! While one might pontificate that we "ought" to stop the "homogenization" of the world's ecosystems or cultures, it may be something we just cannot prevent.

While "ought" implies "can," the inverse is not true. "Can" does not imply "ought.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Ethics in Natural Resources Management: Some Concepts and Food for Thought1
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.