THE BIG LIE ABOUT 'MISSILE DEFENSE": It's Really a Plan for American Military Control of Space

By Hurtig, Mel | CCPA Monitor, February 2005 | Go to article overview

THE BIG LIE ABOUT 'MISSILE DEFENSE": It's Really a Plan for American Military Control of Space


Hurtig, Mel, CCPA Monitor


There are so many things so seriously wrong with the misleadingly-titled American "missile defense shield" that it's difficult to do proper justice to the subject in a short column like this. But I'll touch on a few of the main problems before turning to by far the most dangerous and potentially disastrous threat that so many Canadians and so many people in other countries are fearful about.

First, there's much evidence that current U.S. military plans, directly tied to "missile defense," are rapidly pushing the world toward the brink of an apocalyptic nuclear confrontation. As Mohamed El-Baradei, Director-General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said recently, "Never was the danger as great as it is today. An atomic war draws nearer."

Both the mayor of Hiroshima and UN secretary-General Kofi Annan are among those who have issued similar dire warnings.

second, despite repeated denials from the Martin government in Ottawa, U.S. plans are now leading to the abandonment of important long-standing arms control agreements that have improved global security for over three decades. At the same time, both Russia and China are directly responding to the Bush-Rumsfeld plans in a new arms race that will inevitably spread quickly to India and Pakistan, and to many other countries, as the U.S. proceeds with the development of new nuclear weapons and resumes nuclear testing.

Despite numerous assurances from Ottawa to the contrary, Russian and Chinese threats are ominous. Both countries are now claiming they have no alternative but to respond to the accelerated American arms buildup. Many experts in the U.S. and elsewhere warn that the Bush administration's actions convey a clear message to present and future adversaries: "Spare no effort to acquire and stockpile nuclear weapons."

Third, just as the American-led war on Iraq diverted the U.S. from the real threat to its security-terrorism-the ballistic missile system is diverting tens of billions of dollars away from the menacing probability that terrorists will try to smuggle weapons of mass destruction into the U.S.

Missile defense should be far down on the list of U.S. priorities, especially since the system now being promoted doesn't work, cannot work, and will not work no matter how many hundreds of billions of dollars are added to the $150 billion already poured into the pockets of voracious American defense contractors.

According to the widely-respected Washington-based Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), even a fully constructed national missile defense system would not be effective. "The system the Bush administration plans to deploy," says the UCS, "will have essentially no defense capability even if the technology worked perfectly, because it will be vulnerable to counter-measures that are much easier to build."

Okay, then, if virtually all of the most brilliant scientists in the U.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

THE BIG LIE ABOUT 'MISSILE DEFENSE": It's Really a Plan for American Military Control of Space
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.