Employer Difficulty in FMLA Implementation: A Look at Eighth Circuit Interpretation of "Serious Health Condition" and Employee Notice Requirements

By Nelson, Kenza Bemis | Journal of Corporation Law, Spring 2005 | Go to article overview

Employer Difficulty in FMLA Implementation: A Look at Eighth Circuit Interpretation of "Serious Health Condition" and Employee Notice Requirements


Nelson, Kenza Bemis, Journal of Corporation Law


I. INTRODUCTION

The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) was adopted in 1993 in response to growing changes in the American way of life and its workforce.1 Before 1993, the United States had no formal regulatory system for providing family or medical leave; if such leave did exist, employers granted it voluntarily.2 Unfortunately, this voluntary system was not providing adequate protection for employees.3 Thus, after first being introduced to the House of Representatives in 1992, the FMLA was signed by President Clinton on Februarys, 1993.4

Recently, there has been a great deal of litigation in the circuit courts on several parts of the FMLA. This Note will analyze two of these components: "serious health conditions" and employee notice requirements. Generally, these two areas have the greatest impact on employers. Heavy consequences exist if employers do not correctly ascertain whether an employee meets the "serious health condition" requirements and/or if employers do not realize that an employee has put them on notice of his or her need for FMLA leave.5

Although litigation has been fervent in all circuits, this Note will use the framework of the Eighth Circuit. There will, however, be occasional reference to holdings in other circuits. The Note will conclude with several recommendations to remedy the problems arising under the FMLA, in an effort to determine which of these possibilities would best protect employers.

II. BACKGROUND

The FMLA, as adopted by Congress, is codified in Chapter 29 of the U.S. Code. Section 2654 includes a direction to the Department of Labor (DOL) to create and implement regulations to help guide employers and employees in understanding and carrying out the Act.6 These regulations further detail and interpret all sections of the FMLA. The regulations became effective on February 6, 1995.7 Together, the Code and the regulations offer direction to employers and employees about their rights under the FMLA.

A. FMLA Purposes

Congress outlined the purposes of the FMLA to cater equally to both employees and employers.8 Congress intended that the Act should not prevent employers from implementing leave policies more generous to employees than the Act required.9 This illustrates Congress's belief in the effectiveness, both culturally and economically, of mandated employee leave policies. Congress believed the Act would be cost-effective to employers, because studies showed it was much cheaper to reinstate employees after returning from leave than to hire replacements.10 The Senate failed to anticipate any employer difficulty implementing the Act, focusing only on the cost-effectiveness of leave benefits.

B. Statutory Provisions

The FMLA applies to any employee who has worked for the employer for at least twelve months and has provided at least 1250 hours of service to the employer during that time." The Act covers any employer who employs fifty or more employees during the working day during each of twenty or more work weeks out of the year.12 The FMLA defines employer as "any industry or activity affecting commerce," thus including corporations.13

1. "Serious Health Condition"

The FMLA allows employees to take up to twelve weeks of leave during any twelve-month period.14 To qualify for this leave, an individual, or a statutorily defined member of the individual's family, must have one of the conditions specified by Congress in section 2612.15 These conditions, with the exception of childbirth and adoption which are also covered, revolve around the definition of a "serious health condition," as defined by the DOL in its regulations.16 If an employer questions whether an employee or an employee's spouse, child, or parent has a "serious health condition" that complies with the statute, the employer has a right to request a certification from the employee's health care provider.17

2. Notice Requirements

The FMLA also contains notice requirements outlining when an employee must inform an employer of the need for leave. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Employer Difficulty in FMLA Implementation: A Look at Eighth Circuit Interpretation of "Serious Health Condition" and Employee Notice Requirements
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.