A New Measure of Party Strength

By Ceaser, James W.; Saldin, Robert P. | Political Research Quarterly, June 2005 | Go to article overview

A New Measure of Party Strength


Ceaser, James W., Saldin, Robert P., Political Research Quarterly


In order to measure the strength of the parties in each state, the Major Party Index (MPI) was built by averaging the results of the six major elections that take place in the fifty states. This index allows us to describe the absolute and comparative partisan leaning of each state in each election and identify trends of party strength over time within individual states, among regions, and within the nation as a whole. The MPI sheds considerable light on three general developments: (1) a national change from Democratic dominance in the 1980s to a Republican edge by 2002, (2) significant regional realignments in the South and New England, and (3) a strong trend toward greater consistency between partisan voting at the federal and state levels.

Party strength in the United States is generally measured by public opinion polls in which respondents report their own partisan identification. There are well-known advantages to this approach. It permits analyses that relate an individual's party preference to attitudinal and demographic factors, thereby allowing for the generation and testing of hypotheses about the causes of party attachment. Self-identification can also be correlated with reported votes, which allows for inquiries into the relative importance of party preference for electoral behavior. For these reasons, poll surveys have become the preferred standard in academic research. But this method has admitted weaknesses. Polls are expensive and they often have a significant margin of error, which in the case of general national polls increases greatly as one begins to investigate particular sub-groups or geographical regions. Partisan self-identification by itself, moreover, does not tell us how people actually vote. For example, many white Southerners after 1950 identified themselves as Democrats or independents even as they had become reliable Republican voters at the presidential level. Finally, partisan self-identification itself says nothing about the habitual behavior-if it existsof independents. Many analysts today suspect that most voters who call themselves independents in fact have a fairly distinct partisan leaning when it comes to casting their ballots. '

Another approach to assessing party strength is to look at election results and measure party standing by the votes each party's candidates received. This method also has its strong points. It is inexpensive (at least for scholars), as the government picks up all of the costs of the research project by holding elections. The margin of error is fairly low, with the inaccuracies being limited to fraud and the now welldocumented difficulties encountered in counting and recording voles (hanging chads, undervotcs, voting machine failure, and the like).2 Election results also have the advantage of directly measuring the phenomenon: if one is interested in party strength, it makes great sense to look at how citizens actually vote. Still, there are weaknesses in using electoral results. The statistics are tied to aggregates (collective units), not to individuals, which makes it impossible to connect the vote to attitudinal variables and difficult to relate it to many demographic factors (other, of course, than geography itself).3 Another problem is that a vote for a particular candidate is by no means the same thing as an expression of support for a party; it may only reflect a preference for a particular individual, as when millions of Democrats pulled the lever for the war hero Dwight Eisenhower in 1952 and 1956. Election results from any single election may therefore reveal little about "real" or "normal" party strength.

All approaches are bound to have strengths and weaknesses, and the question of a measurements worth should be judged on the practical grounds of its helpfulness as an investigative tool. Despite the drawbacks just noted, the idea of measuring party strength on the basis of election results seems attractive enough to hold considerable interest for political scientists-not as a substitute for, but as a supplement to, polling methods. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A New Measure of Party Strength
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.