The Supreme Court and Opinion Content: The Use of the Federalist Papers
Corley, Pamela C., Howard, Robert M., Nixon, David C., Political Research Quarterly
Many scholars of the Supreme Court and many justices assert the importance of the Federalist Papers. They provide important evidence of original meaning and interpretation of the Constitution, and there is evidence that there is an increase in citations to the Federalist Papers in Supreme Court opinions. While some may view this increased citation use as a positive development because it demonstrates reliance on legal authority in judicial decisions, we provide evidence that in a period marked by dissensus and controversy, the use of the Federalist Papers represents externally and internally oriented strategic attempts by the justices to add legitimacy to constitutional interpretation, ā¦
The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia
Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:
- Questia's entire collection
- Automatic bibliography creation
- More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
- Ad-free environment
Already a member? Log in now.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information:
Article title: The Supreme Court and Opinion Content: The Use of the Federalist Papers.
Contributors: Corley, Pamela C. - Author, Howard, Robert M. - Author, Nixon, David C. - Author.
Journal title: Political Research Quarterly.
Volume: 58.
Issue: 2
Publication date: June 2005.
Page number: 329+.
© 2002 Political Research Quarterly.
Provided by ProQuest LLC. All Rights Reserved.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.
- Georgia
- Arial
- Times New Roman
- Verdana
- Courier/monospaced
Reset