From Practice to Theory: Inclusive Models Require Inclusive Theories

By Zaretsky, Lindy | American Secondary Education, Summer 2005 | Go to article overview

From Practice to Theory: Inclusive Models Require Inclusive Theories


Zaretsky, Lindy, American Secondary Education


ABSTRACT

This paper discusses the practical ramifications of competing theoretical perspectives in special education. Despite the relationship between scholarly conceptions of special education and its ultimate practice, the paper concludes with empirical data that appears to indicate that many (if not most) practicing administrators fail to appreciate the theoretical underpinnings of their very own professional understanding. This limits the potential for greater interdisciplinary understandings of special education or any practical reconciliation between competing perspectives.

(ProQuest Information and Learning: ... denotes text stops here in original.)

INTRODUCTION

There are probably few areas of inquiry in education that are as troublesome and divisive as disability and special education. Conceptual understandings of special education and disability are informed by numerous other fields which themselves draw on entirely different scholarly traditions - most particularly the medical and the social sciences. The lack of conceptual agreement about the nature of the field is coupled with the practical difficulty of meeting disparate stakeholders' needs despite a persistent scarcity of resources. These factors qualify disability and special education as uniquely problematic areas of academic interest (Clark, Dyson & Millward, 1998; Jordan, 2001; Skrtic, 1995).

Currently, there is a paucity of dialogue about special education theorizing in the practitioner's arena. For example, few practitioners understand what theoretical underpinnings are associated with the practice of full inclusion or why others might favor a range of alternative placement options from segregated to integrated special education settings for students with special needs. To this end, there is a considerable need to support practitioners in understanding how they have come to know and understand special education, disability and inclusion in different ways. In the absence of these theory and practice connections, special education in practice will remain a highly contentious and conflicted school arena.

I believe that a more inclusive social science can increase acceptance of different knowledge claims arrived at in various ways. This paper in no way discounts or dismisses the knowledge contributions of; for example, medicine and psychology to special education, but rather calls for greater appreciation and ultimately inclusivity of the socio-cultural means of arriving at different understandings. My aim is to encourage greater clarity among theories and practices regarding the knowledge claims we make, the evidence assembled in support of those claims, and the logic employed when linking that evidence to such knowledge claims. These principles can (and should) underpin our scholarly and practical work in order to provide for greater methodological understandings that invite sound decision-making practice. An example of this is the selection of programs and practices for students who receive special education services.

Over the last several years both scholars and practitioners in special education and disability studies have begun to critique the whole notion of inclusion, creating a heated debate about what exactly constitutes inclusive educational programs and practices for students with disabilities. For example, in my own experiences as principal and researcher in special education and leadership, I have consistently found that there has been an overemphasis and over-reliance during parent-school personnel meetings on psychometric testing of students, which in special education, largely implies a behaviorist-objectivist discourse (Zaretsky, 2003; Zaretsky, 2004). I have found that this particular discourse also tends to dominate thinking in both policymaking and accountability initiatives. A single perspective, however, is plainly inadequate for developing a more sophisticated understanding of what might constitute valid knowledge and expertise in special education. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

From Practice to Theory: Inclusive Models Require Inclusive Theories
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.