Are the Justices Serving Too Long? an Assessment of Tenure on the U.S. Supreme Court

By McGuire, Kevin T. | Judicature, July/August 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Are the Justices Serving Too Long? an Assessment of Tenure on the U.S. Supreme Court

McGuire, Kevin T., Judicature

The image of Chief Justice William Rehnquist, encumbered by illness, tentatively making his way down the west steps of the Capitol to administer the oath of office to the newly re-elected President George W. Bush offered a vivid illustration of the humanity of the Supreme Court. Virtually all of the justices are now well into the autumn of their careers; the entire Court, save Justice Clarence Thomas, is age 65 or older. Despite their age, the current justices have shown little sign of turnover. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's recently announced departure is the first in over a decade. Indeed, no group of justices has served together this long since John Marshall was sitting on the Court.

In light of these facts, numerous observers of the Court have concluded that it is time to reconsider life tenure for the justices. Reviving proposals that have been in circulation since the 1990s, observers have begun to make various suggestions to transform the Court's membership-imposing term limits or elevatingjustices to senior status after a certain number of years, for example1-but these proposals presuppose that the current Court constitutes a deviation from the historical norm so substantial as to require legislative reform. Centering on such problems as judicial incapacitation and entrenched power, strategic retirements from the Court, and presidential incentives to select young nominees unseasoned for service, critics charge that lifetime appointments to the Court should be replaced with a system that secures more regular turnover and reduces the age of the justices.

But is reform actually warranted? Are the justices, in fact, too elderly, too stubbornly fixed, or serving too long? This article examines some of the historical trends in the length of service on the Court and concludes that, contrary to current assertions, the tenure of the justices has been quite stable over time. While the age of the justices is presently higher than the historical mean, it is not substantially so. Moreover, by some measures, the justices are spending no more time on the Court than their brethren who have served over the past 150 years. In fact, when viewing their tenure in light of changing life expectancies, the modern justices are actually controlling judicial policy for less time than the justices in any previous period. Given these historical trends, natural attrition will almost surely correct any perceived problems with the present set of justices.

Overview of the current Court

Judging by the Court's current composition, it is not difficult to discern the cause for concern. Two of the justices, William Rehnquist and John Paul Stevens, are octogenarians, having served longer than all but a handful of the jurists ever to sit on the Court. Chief Justice Rehnquist's 33 years-a record of service equal to that of William Brennan, Joseph Story, and the elder John Harlan-is among the 10 longest in history, and Justice Stevens' time on the Court-only four years less-places him among the top 15 longest serving. Following close on their heels at age 75 is Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. Even with a decade less service on the Court than the chief justice, she will retire one of the longest serving justices in history.2

As Table 1 illustrates, the balance of the Court is scarcely any less mature. Quite notably, there is relatively little variation in the ages of the remaining six justices; leaving aside Justice Thomas, only seven years separates the eldest, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, from the youngest, Justice David Souter. Furthermore, two of these justices, Antonin Scalia and Anthony Kennedy, have been sitting on the Court for nearly 20 years.

Perhaps not surprisingly, several members of the Court have suffered serious health complications. Most recently, Chief Justice Rehnquist was diagnosed with cancer of the thyroid. In the 1990s, Justice Ginsburg underwent surgery for colon cancer, and Justice Stevens was treated for prostate cancer.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Are the Justices Serving Too Long? an Assessment of Tenure on the U.S. Supreme Court


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?