The Relevance of Cultural Identity: Relying upon Foundations of Race and Gender as Laypeople Plan a Newscast

By Lind, Rebecca Ann | Journalism and Communication Monographs, Autumn 2001 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Relevance of Cultural Identity: Relying upon Foundations of Race and Gender as Laypeople Plan a Newscast


Lind, Rebecca Ann, Journalism and Communication Monographs


Abstract

This study placed eighteen groups of African-, European-, and Latin-Americans (divided by race and gender) into the role of news producers; each peer group was charged with planning a hypothetical TV newscast from a list of realistic stories. The study investigates the relevance of cultural identity as these groups went about their task, and found clear differences in the extent to which cultural identity was articulated, the type of identity considered (race, gender, religion), whether the focus was on the ingroup or outgroup, and whether the references were affirmatively or negatively valenced. The study also compares the content different cultural groups included in the newscasts. Assuming that a context can function actively to "weave together" (rather than the more passive conceptualization of context as that which surrounds), this research concludes that discourses of separateness, of narrowly defined identity, and of inequality were common; the context enacted by participants revealed a strained, uneven social fabric.

Since the early 1980s, when Stuart Hall (1980) theorized the processes of encoding and decoding, and David Morley (1980) began empirical examination of the encoding/decoding model, scholars have investigated the variety of social forces that help construct audiences' readings of mediated texts. Now classic research such as that conducted by Ang (1985); Hobson (1982); Liebes (1988); Liebes & Katz (1990); and Radway (1984), as well as more recent analyses and anthologies (Gillespie, 1995; Livingstone & Lunt, 1994; Morley, 1992; Seiter, Borchers, Kreutzner, & Warth, 1989), have contributed to an understanding that the interpretation of media content is not based on simple demographic variables. Instead, as the present monograph argues, social positions structure and restrict access to various codes and discourses; hence identification with a cultural subgroup and the concept of relevancy are both major factors in determining how a text will be read (or whether it will be approached). As Money (1985, p. 239) wrote, "The meaning of the text will be constructed differently according to the discourses (knowledges, prejudices, resistances, etc.) brought to bear by the reader, and the crucial factor in the encounter of audience/subject and text will be the range of discourses at the disposal of the audience."

Cohen's (1991) presentation of relevancy nicely articulated the interrelationship of text and audience in the creation of meaning. Playing on Katz & Foulkes' (1962, p. 378) description of the fully audience-centered uses and gratifications tradition (which asks "not `What do the media do to people?' but `What do people do with the media?"'), Cohen asserted that "the concept of relevancy does not separate what the text does to viewers from what viewers do to the text" (1991, p. 453). Fiske (1989; 1988; 1987) further argued that when considering relevance, the audience (members of which are socially and historically constructed subjects) precedes the text. Fiske's position was that various - but not limitless - meanings can be made from the text. The possible range of interpretations is bounded because "the viewer makes meanings and pleasures from television that are relevant to his or her social allegiances at the moment of viewing; the criteria for relevance precede the viewing moment" (1988, p. 247).

Though bounded, the range of possible interpretations of media content is sufficiently broad to have encouraged scholars, including Morley (1986), to conclude that the notion of classifying audience interpretations of television texts as representing preferred, negotiated, or oppositional meanings (Hall, 1980) should be revisited. Money (1986, p. 45) underscored the importance of the relevancy concept when he suggested that "we need to deal more with the relevance/irrelevance and comprehension/incomprehension dimensions of interpretation and decoding, rather than being directly concerned with the acceptance or rejection of particular substantive ideological theses or propositions.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Relevance of Cultural Identity: Relying upon Foundations of Race and Gender as Laypeople Plan a Newscast
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?