Why Don't Recessions Encourage More R&D Spending?

By Barlevy, Gadi | Chicago Fed Letter, November 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Why Don't Recessions Encourage More R&D Spending?

Barlevy, Gadi, Chicago Fed Letter

Economists sometimes argue that recessions promote activities that ultimately contribute to long-run growth. But evidence suggests research and development, one important source of economic growth, falls rather than rises during recessions, even for firms that do not appear to be credit constrained. The author discusses an alternative explanation for this pattern.

In recent years, economists have revived the notion, often associated with the late economist Joseph Schumpeter, that economic downturns play an important role in promoting long-run productivity growth. In this Chicago Fed Letter, I report on my work in Barlevy (2005), which examhies how recessions affect one particular channel for growth-namely, research and development (R&D).1

The modern formulation of Schumpeter's idea builds on the observation that production is less profitable during recessions. As a result, recessions are an ideal time for firms to engage in activities that enhance their productivity but tend to interfere with production. Examples of such activities include retraining workers, retooling a shop floor, upgrading capital equipment, and experimenting with ways of providing better products at lower costs. If slack periods encourage firms to undertake needed improvements that they were reluctant to start earlier, these periods will lead to higher eventual productivity.

The reallocation of resources from production to enhancing future productivity can occur both within firms-whereby resources are redirected from the production floor to improving innovation-and between firms, as some firms shed workers who are in turn hired by budding entrepreneurs developing new ideas and trying to start up competing firms. Since product development requires support staff as well as skilled labor, it is not unreasonable that the production workers who are let go by some established firms will be of value to emerging firms that are developing new products.2

Following this logic, one would expect that more resources should be allocated to formal R&D during recessions. In particular, as noted by Griliches (1990), recessions do not seem to affect the ability of researchers to come up with new ideas, at least as measured by the number of new patents that result from a given research effort.* If production suffers during recessions while R&D does not, then recessions should be an ideal time to actively seek out and develop new ideas and products.

Nevertheless, the empirical evidence shows that R&D tends to fall during recessions, not rise. The primary data source on R&D activity in the U.S. is the National Science Foundation (NSF), which compiles data on annual R&D expenditures by sector and by source of funding. Figure 1 plots the growth rate of R&D expenditures identified by the NSF as financed and performed by private industry, adjusted for the rate of overall inflation. It also plots the growth rate in the number of full-time equivalent scientists and engineers employed by private industry, which is one of the primary inputs into R&D. Although the latter series only captures a part of RM) activity, it has an advantage in that it does not depend on the price of R&D inputs. This is important, since inflation adjustments to nominal R&D expenditures may not accurately reflect changes in the price of R&D. The two data series track each other closely, suggesting changes in inflation-adjusted R&D expenditures truly reflect changes in the extent of R&D.

To appreciate how R&D activity varies over the business cycle, figure 1 also depicts the growth rate of real gross domestic product (GDP). The shaded regions correspond to recessions as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). As can be seen in the figure, periods of economic growth are associated with a more rapid increase in R&D. In almost all recession years, at least one measure of R&D activity falls.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Why Don't Recessions Encourage More R&D Spending?


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?