Medicaid under Court Attack

By King, Edward C. | Aging Today, September/October 2005 | Go to article overview

Medicaid under Court Attack

King, Edward C., Aging Today

Medicaid, the primary mechanism in the United States for providing healthcare to low-income elders and people with disabilities, is under attack. Serious and determined moves are afoot not only to scale the program down, but also to erode the notion of entitlement, so as to reduce the ability of beneficiaries to assert rights under Medicaid. What is not commonly understood is that some of these efforts to weaken the entitlement of Medicaid-the promise that everyone who meets program eligibility requirements is entitled to services-are focused on the federal judicial system.

The U.S. federal court system is at the center of profoundly important struggles. During recent years, a remarkably high percentage of federal judicial appointees have been nominated because they had demonstrated-through their judicial decisions, public statements or actions as attorneys-a view that congressional power to provide protections or benefits for those who may be subject to discrimination, or who are particularly vulnerable, should be reduced. A corollary of this view is that currently existing federal protective and antidiscriminatory laws should be enforced as little as possible.


The Medicaid statute has drawn the particular interest of this movement, which is already rolling back rights and entitlements of ethnic and racial minorities and of the needy and the vulnerable in American society. State cutbacks in long-term care show how this concerted effort to change the federal judiciary and courts imperils Medicaid and low-income elders. To reduce healthcare costs, several states have simply redefined eligibility for nursing-facility services, which are mandatory under the Medicaid Act. Obviously, if states can redefine and reduce eligibility for such services in response to tight budget situations, the mandatory-services requirement is undone-and little is left that older, extremely infirm people can rely on.

In 2003, Kentucky's Medicaid agency told some 3,000 people, previously certified as requiring long-term care, that they were no longer eligible for nursing-facility services or home and community-based services. Done simply to save state money, this action did not take into account that no improvement was evident in the condition of any of these patients; there was no health-related reason for the state's action. Unable to pay their bills, thousands were deprived of necessary care and hundreds were discharged from nursing homes.

In response, the National Senior Citizens Law Center (NSCLC) and the Kentucky Office of Legal Service Programs filed suit in federal court. Lawsuits to enforce rights secured by federal law or the U.S. Constitution historically have been based on a 19th-century civil rights law known as Section 1983. This statute allows individuals to sue state officials who violate traditional civil rights and other federal rights, including benefits under government programs, such as Medicaid. Following this long-established approach, the federal court did exercise jurisdiction over the case and agreed that Kentucky's actions were arbitrary, without any health-related purpose. The court in 2004 denied the state's efforts to have the case dismissed and granted a preliminary injunction, ordering Kentucky to reinstate the previous definition and to restore benefits. The case was then settled, with plaintiffs getting all they had sought in the case.


At about the same time, Oregon's Medicaid agency redefined eligibility for long-term care in essentially the same way, so NSCLC filed suit there. However, the United States Supreme Court in recent decades has dramatically restricted the application of Section 1983. In the high court's most recent ruling on this point, Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote that the provision cannot be used to enforce federal statutes through a private lawsuit "unless Congress speaks with a clear voice and manifests an unambiguous intent to confer individual rights.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Medicaid under Court Attack


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.