Personality and Emotional Correlates of Right-Wing Authoritarianism

By Butler, J. Corey | Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, January 1, 2000 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Personality and Emotional Correlates of Right-Wing Authoritarianism


Butler, J. Corey, Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal


Authoritarianism, the tendency to be hierarchical, conventional, and intolerant, has been implicated by research as an extreme feature of general right-wing ideology. The relationship between this ideological pattern and variables of personality and emotion was investigated in three studies. Studies 1 and 2 assessed personality traits in terms of the five-factor model, as well as right-wing authoritarianism, conservatism, and a battery of other political attitude measures. Study 3 examined the positive and negative affect of individuals with differing levels of authoritarianism. The results demonstrate that the authoritarian syndrome is primarily characterized by low openness to experience, and that it is unrelated to self-reported measures of emotion.

Ever since the publication, half a century ago, of The Authoritarian Personality (Adorno, Frenkel-Brunswik, Levinson, and Sanford, 1950), the idea that social and political beliefs could be understood in terms of basic personality structure has captured the imagination of psychologists. A gripping issue in the era of World War II, authoritarianism was conceived by these early researchers as the potential for fascism. Then and now, the authoritarian could be characterized as conventional, submissive to authority, and aggressive toward deviants and outsiders (Altemeyer, 1981). Although the original construct has oscillated in popularity, receiving both glowing praise and substantial criticism, the study of authoritarianism seems to have made a comeback in recent years (Peterson, Smirles, & Wentworth, 1997). Particularly noteworthy is Altemeyer's contribution of a psychometrically sound and substantially validated instrument in this arena, the Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale (Altemeyer, 1981, 1988, 1996). With this improved methodology, as well as theoretical mechanisms which are no longer tied to psychodynamic models, contemporary researchers stand poised to make great progress in understanding the many right-wing and reactionary political movements which are currently flourishing around the world. In fact, it seems very possible that militant fundamentalists, radical militiamen, neo-Nazi skinheads, and other intolerant extremists have common personality characteristics (George & Wilcox, 1996). Because personality, temperament, and emotion are substantially intermingled, it seems worthwhile to study the role of both the personality and the affective variables associated with right-wing authoritarianism.

In a theoretical paper published several years ago, Stone (1983) drew upon earlier work by Tomkins (1963,1965) and proposed that there are two dimensions of personality and ideology, left and right. The former is characterized by positive affect, humanism, liberalism, and egalitarianism, whereas the latter includes negative affect, normativism, conservatism, and authoritarianism. In a more recent analysis of the literature, Eckhardt (1991) similarly proposed that because such dimensions as authoritarianism, conservatism, dogmatism, militarism, and religiosity are consistently correlated, they should be considered different aspects of the same multifaceted construct, or "different parts of the same forest" (p. 121). The author noted that the weakest member in this constellation of affect, cognition, and behavior was the connection between personality and ideology. Neuroticism, in particular, does not reliably correlate with the rest of the pattern. This is a peculiar finding if we recall that the authoritarian syndrome was originally described as a disorder of the personality. The problem may be an over reliance on the psychodynamic approach and its concomitant principles of anxiety, denial, repression, and projection. As Altemeyer (1988, 1996) has noted, this model of childhood conflict and inflated superegos is now untenable as an explanatory theory of authoritarianism.

Contemporary research has demonstrated that the origins of authoritarianism are derived from several different sources, including genetics (Scarr, 1981); life experiences, especially those occurring during adolescence (Altemeyer, 1988); and possibly educational experiences (Altemeyer, 1996).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Personality and Emotional Correlates of Right-Wing Authoritarianism
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?