Assessing the Genocide and Political Mass Murder Framework: The Case of Uzbekistan

By Daniels, Mike | The George Washington International Law Review, January 1, 2005 | Go to article overview

Assessing the Genocide and Political Mass Murder Framework: The Case of Uzbekistan


Daniels, Mike, The George Washington International Law Review


I. INTRODUCTION

In No Lessons Learned from the Holocaust? Assessing Risks of Genocide and Political Mass Murder Since 1955, author Barbara Harff lays out "six factors that jointly make it possible to distinguish with 74% accuracy . . . regime collapses that do and those that do not lead to geno-Xpoliticide."1 Professor Harff s article on the risks of genocide marks a new step in the study of genocide and related phenomena. It is one of the first studies to bring together a large sample of genocide cases for quantitative analysis. Harff considers a number of characteristics of states as possible precursors to genocide and seeks to determine which show statistically significant correlations to actual genocides and politicides across a large set of cases. She then analyzes current states and develops a "watch list" for countries that exhibit both armed conflict and one or more of the factors identified as precursors to genocide or politicide.2 The net result of Harff s study is a set of seven factors-one screening criterion and six evaluation criteria-that successfully identify almost three-quarters of her sampled cases.

Academic focus on Uzbekistan, and Central Asia more generally, has until recently been limited to a discrete few. Composed of states barely a decade old, the study of Central Asia requires additional emphasis to ensure the accuracy of its contributions to global comparative analyses. This Article seeks to begin that process in the exploration of genocide in global comparative studies. Uzbekistan is a particularly interesting place to apply Harff s model, as it arguably demonstrates five of the six distinguishing factors, yet Harff fails to include it on the "watch list."3 In one sense, Uzbekistan remains in the broad categories of states without genocide or armed conflict. Yet, these categorizations are debatable.

Using Uzbekistan as a case study, this Article considers HarfFs theory in light of the overarching goal of "us [ing] social science analysis to explain genocides . . . with an eye to developing early warning systems to detect humanitarian disasters in the making."4

Part II defines genocide and discusses a brief history of recent genocidal atrocities. Part III explores Harff s methodology and evaluates Uzbekistan as a genocide watch candidate in light of Harff s six factors, while also using the case of Uzbekistan to critique certain aspects of Harff s framework. It considers three weaknesses in Harff s framework: the use of "political upheaval"5 as a screening criterion for potential geno-/politicides; the explanation of the "trade openness" factor;6 and the conflation of genocide and political mass murders.7

Part III also explores the extent to which the decision not to place Uzbekistan on the "watch list" is a result of failures in Harff s framework-as well as a failure of the global databases on conflict to incorporate regional events in Central Asia-thereby demonstrating the relevance of regional expertise in applying more general comparative theories, including an exploration of how the case of Uzbekistan challenges the categorization of countries by broad political, social and economic variables implicit in Harff s model. Finally, Part III identifies important risk factors that are not used by Harff s model, but that are important considerations in evaluating potential risk, and attempts to evaluate the danger of genocide in Uzbekistan.

II. PRIOR EVALUATION OF GENOCIDE

A. Definition of Genocide

The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Genocide Convention)8 defines genocide as:

[A]ny of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, such as: (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; and (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Assessing the Genocide and Political Mass Murder Framework: The Case of Uzbekistan
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.