The Economics of Municipal Recycling: A Preliminary Analysis

By Folz, David H. | Public Administration Quarterly, Fall 1995 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Economics of Municipal Recycling: A Preliminary Analysis


Folz, David H., Public Administration Quarterly


INTRODUCTION

Recycling is an increasingly popular strategy for dealing with the solid waste imperatives common to many US localities.(1) Whether faced with dwindling landfill capacity, rising charges for waste disposal or tougher federal, state, and county solid waste management policies, the appeal of recycling lies in its potential to be a primary method, along with source reduction and composting for managing the municipal solid waste stream (Blumberg and Gottlieb, 1989). Recycling can help to control the sky-rocketing costs of landfill disposal and incineration by diverting a significant proportion of the solid waste produced locally.

Some observers characterize this growing volume of waste and the increasing cost for disposing of it as a "solid waste crisis" (Good et al., 1991).(2) While the actual potential for diversion depends upon the composition of a locality's waste stream and the market for various materials, one estimate suggests that over 80% of the typical municipal solid waste stream technically can be recycled or composted (Denison and Ruston, 1990:1).

For the growing proportion of citizens concerned about the quality of the local environment and the conservation of natural resources, recycling presents a tangible, intrinsically satisfying way to participate in solving an environmental problem to which everyone contributes (De Young, 1986). Its remarkable embrace by citizens in hundreds of communities across the country signifies a fundamental shift in municipal waste management policy (Folz, 1991a; West, Feiock, and Lee, 1992). Clearly, recycling is more than a fleeting eco-fashion; it is a coproduced service that has the potential to strengthen citizens' commitment to the community and to forge a stronger bond between administrators and citizens (Folz, 1991b; Brudney, 1990; Levine, 1984; Frederickson, 1982).

The premier challenge for local officials is to deliver on the promise of recycling within the constraints imposed by available fiscal resources. Recycling must compete with other, equally popular programs for a portion of budgets already stressed or bridled by revenue shortfalls. The size, scope, and type of recycling program determine the capital investment and operating budget required. Substantial cutbacks in recycling budgets for some of the nation's largest cities are only the most widely publicized events in a pattern of cutbacks in the growth of state and local government expenditures (Watson, 1991).

When strapped for cash, funds for recycling planning, technical assistance, public education, and marketing are particularly vulnerable since these efforts typically yield measurable dividends over a period longer than the annual budget cycle. To justify, defend or preserve priority spending for recycling programs advocates would be in a stronger bargaining position if they document the benefits and costs of a recycling program.

Revenues from the sale of recovered materials rarely recoup the costs of operating a recycling program but as Denison and Ruston (1990:105) observe, some assessments of recycling are predicated on the assumption that it "must be entirely self-supporting from the sale of reclaimed materials before it can qualify as a legitimate waste management option." Calculation of both program costs and the full range of "avoided costs" attributable to recycling will yield more accurate estimates of the economic value of recycling and "provide a cost-effective rationale for the financial and policy support such a program needs in order to reach the goals it is capable of achieving" (Blumberg and Gottlieb, 1989:215).

This article examines several issues germane to an evaluation of the economics of a local materials recovery program. How do cities fund their recycling programs? How much do different types of recycling programs cost? Why do some cities have lower unit operating costs for similar recycling programs? How much revenue is generated from materials sales?

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Economics of Municipal Recycling: A Preliminary Analysis
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?