Applying the Mobile-Sierra Doctrine to Market-Based Rate Contracts

By Tewksbury, David G.; Lim, Stephanie S. | Energy Law Journal, July 1, 2005 | Go to article overview

Applying the Mobile-Sierra Doctrine to Market-Based Rate Contracts


Tewksbury, David G., Lim, Stephanie S., Energy Law Journal


I. INTRODUCTION

In companion decisions issued nearly half a century ago, United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Services Corp.1 and FPC v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.,2 the Supreme Court considered the authority of the Federal Power Commission (FPC), predecessor of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC),3 to modify the rates, terms, and conditions of contracts for services subject to its jurisdiction under the Natural Gas Act (NGA)4 and Part II of the Federal Power Act (FPA),5 respectively. Recognizing that these statutes "permit[] the relations between the parties to be established initially by contract,"6 the Court articulated the so-called "Mobile-Sierra" doctrine, which bars the Commission from reforming or abrogating a fixed-rate contract absent a showing that contract reformation or abrogation is required to protect the public interest.7 In articulating the doctrine, the Supreme Court explained that the resulting "public interest" standard of review under Mobile-Sierra "presences] the integrity of contracts," thereby "permit[ting] the stability of supply arrangements which all agree is essential to the health of the ... industry."8

Mobile and Sierra were decided in the context of a traditional, cost-ofservice regulatory regime under which contracts were, as a general matter, individually filed with, and reviewed by, the Commission. In recent years, the FERC has adopted a market-oriented ratemaking approach for wholesale sales of electricity and certain other jurisdictional services that, among other things, largely dispenses with the filing and review of individual contracts in favor of an increased focus on the adequacy of competition in markets.

While there is a large body of judicial precedent applying the Mobile-Sierra doctrine to cost-based contracts9 and a growing body of judicial precedent affirming the lawfulness of the FERC's market-based rate regime,10 to date, only the FERC has had occasion to consider the applicability and application of the doctrine to contracts for sales of electricity at market-based rates." For its part, the FERC has rejected claims that Mobile-Sierra is inapplicable or should be applied any less stringently where market-based rate contracts12 are concerned. The Commission has done so in three parallel proceedings involving allegedly excessive rates in forward market-based rate contracts executed during the Western energy crisis of 2000-2001. These proceedings were initiated by complaints filed pursuant to section 206 of the FPA13 in late 2001 and early 2002 by: (i) Nevada Power Company (Nevada Power) and Sierra Pacific Power Company ("Sierra" and, together with Nevada Power, the "Nevada Companies"), Southern California Water Company (SCWC) and Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, Washington (Snohomish);14 (ii) the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and the California Electricity Oversight Board (CEOB);15 and (iii) PacifiCorp (together with the Nevada Companies, SCWC, Snohomish, the CPUC and the CEOB, the "Forward Contracts Complainants").16 The FERC has likewise applied a very stringent Mobile-Sierra public interest standard of review in a proceeding where it perceived a seller reorganizing under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (Bankruptcy Code) to be attempting to abrogate a long-term, market-based rate contract through its efforts to cease performance after rejecting the contract in bankruptcy.18 The courts, or at least one court, will soon have an opportunity to address the issue as well, because the FERC's orders in the Nevada Power and CPUC Proceedings denying challenges to forward contracts executed during the Western energy crisis of 2000-2001 are now pending before the Ninth Circuit.19

This article addresses both the applicability and the application of the Mobile-Sierra doctrine to market-based rate contracts. In other words, it considers the question: What, if anything, about market-based rate contracts would warrant a change in when and how the Mobile-Sierra doctrine is applied? …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Applying the Mobile-Sierra Doctrine to Market-Based Rate Contracts
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.