Language Origins

By Ruhlen, Merritt | National Forum, Winter 1996 | Go to article overview

Language Origins

Ruhlen, Merritt, National Forum

The question of language origins may be construed in two quite different ways that are, unfortunately, often confused. On the one hand we may speak of the origin of the language capacity, that is, the universal human capacity to learn and use the language of the culture in which one is raised. While it seems likely that our hominid ancestors such as Eve(1), and much earlier Lucy, probably had linguistic abilities intermediate between those of modern humans and chimpanzees, nothing is really known about the linguistic abilities of such human precursors.

The second sense of language origins, which I will focus on in this article, has to do with the origin of the roughly 5,000 languages currently spoken around the world. Where did these languages come from? In a few instances we actually have a historical record of the origin of certain languages. Thus we are able to trace the various Romance languages--Rumanian, Italian, French, Catalan, Spanish, Portuguese--back through the historical record to their common source, the Latin spoken in Rome some two millennia ago. But even without such historical attestation, we could still recognize that these particular languages share a common origin by the simple fact that they all share resemblant words that are not shared by other languages.

For example, the word for hand in the Romance languages generally looks something like MAN-: Rumanian mina, Italian mano, French main, Catalan ma, Spanish mano, Portuguese mao. We do not need to know that all of these forms derive from the Latin word manus (hand), to recognize that they are similar to one another and contrast sharply with the word for hand in other languages, for example, English hand, Russian ruka, or Japanese te. Furthermore, comparing additional words would reveal that the Romance languages share many such similar words that set them off as a group from other languages. Such historically related languages are called a language family, and the modern descendants of a single original word--the various Romance words for hand in our example--are called cognates.

This evolutionary explanation provides a satisfactory answer to the question of the origin of Spanish, French, or Rumanian, but, at the same time, it raises a further question: What is the origin of the Latin language that gave rise to the various Romance idioms? In other words, where did Latin come from? An English jurist serving in India, Sir William Jones, first gave the answer to this question in 1786 when he observed that the similarities among Latin, (Classical) Greek, and Sanskrit were so numerous, and so precise, that "no philologer could examine them all three, without believing them to have sprung from some common source, which, perhaps, no longer exists."

Indo-European and Proto-Indo-European

During the nineteenth century his even more ancient family that Jones had identified--but not named--came to be known as Indo-European. The Romance languages constitute one branch; other branches include Germanic (English, German, Swedish), Slavic (Russian, Polish, Serbo-Croatian), Baltic (Latvian, Lithuanian), Celtic (Irish, Welsh), Albanian, Greek, Iranian (Farsi), and Indic (Hindi, Bengali). Two branches are extinct: Anatolian (Hittite), spoken 4,000 years ago in present-day Turkey, and Tocharian, spoken in western China in the first millennium A.D. That all of these languages (and many others of course) derive from a single earlier language--Proto-Indo-European--is a fact accepted by all historical linguists. Surprisingly, where this language was actually spoken, and when, remain hotly debated topics to the present day, with the Ukraine at 4,000 B.C. or Anatolia at 7,000 B.C. the favored locations.

Virtually all European languages--and many of those in South Asia--belong to the Indo-European--family. In Europe only Basque, Hungarian, Finnish, Estonian, and Saame (= Lapp, a pejorative term to be avoided) do not. We now have a satisfactory answer to the origin of European languages and, interestingly, Proto-Indo-European, by general consensus, was spoken at least a thousand years before the invention of writing by the Sumerians around 3,000 B. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Language Origins


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.