For Here or to Go? Purchasing Power Parity and the Big Mac

By Pakko, Michael R.; Pollard, Patricia S. | Review - Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, January/February 1996 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

For Here or to Go? Purchasing Power Parity and the Big Mac

Pakko, Michael R., Pollard, Patricia S., Review - Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

The theory of Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) has a long and venerable tradition in international economics. Fundamentally, the theory states that prices of identical goods in different countries should be equal after adjusting for the rate of exchange between currencies. As a theoretical proposition, PPP serves as a solid foundation for thinking about the conditions under which prices in international markets adjust to attain long-term equilibrium. As an empirical matter, however, PPP has been a more elusive concept.2 The Economist has established another, though somewhat more recent, tradition: the Big Mac standard. Since 1986, The Economist has published yearly tongue-in-cheek comparisons of the prices of McDonald's Big Mac sandwich in various countries around the world, evaluating prevailing exchange rates on the basis of these price differentials. A similar index has also been developed by the Union Bank of Switzerland in its annual comparison of prices and incomes around the globe. These lighthearted studies of international hamburger prices have predictably whet the appetites of the popular media and the financial press and have even given serious scholars food for thought.3

The attractive feature of the Big Mac as an indicator of PPP is its uniform composition. With few exceptions, the component ingredients of the Big Mac are the same everywhere around the globe. (See the shaded insert, "A Big Mac Is a Big Mac Is a Big Mac?") For that reason, the Big Mac serves as a convenient market basket of goods with which the purchasing power of different currencies can be compared.

Just as is the case with broader measures, however, the Big Mac standard fails to meet the demanding tests of PPP In this article, we review the fundamental theory of PPP and describe some of the reasons why it might not be expected to hold as a practical matter. Throughout, we use the Big Mac data as an illustrative example. In the process, we also shed some light on the value of the Big Mac sandwich as a palatable measure of PPP


A strong version of the purchasing power parity theory has as its foundation the law of one price. Abstracting from complicating factors such as transportation costs, taxes, and tariffs, the law of one price states that the price of any particular good that is traded on world markets will be the same price in every country engaged in trade.

could buy sesame seeds in the United States and sell them in Britain at a profit. This type of activity-known as arbitragewould tend to drive the price of sesame seeds higher in the United States and lower in Britain, with the process continuing until the law of one price prevailed.

Absolute Purchasing Power Parity

The law of one price generalizes to PPP under special circumstances. Consider price indexes (consumer price indexes, for example) for the United States and Britain, which are constructed by combining the prices of several different

The conditions under which the law of one price generalizes to yield PPP-as summarized in equation 2-are clearly quite restrictive. In particular, because price indexes are weighted averages of individual prices, the law of one price will directly imply PPP only if the same goods are included and if the same weighting scheme is used to construct the indexes for different countries. Usually, these weights are based on actual consumption or production shares. So, for example, if more beef per capita is consumed in Britain and more pickles per capita are consumed in the United States, then the price of beef will be relatively more important in a British price index, whereas the price of pickles will be more important in a U.S. index. Even if beef and pickle prices are always identical in the two countries, a rise in the world price of beef will have a larger effect on the British price index than on the U.S. index.

Consequently, testing the absolute version of PPP requires careful construction of price indexes so that a common market basket of goods is measured.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

For Here or to Go? Purchasing Power Parity and the Big Mac


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?