Elgar and Academicism 3: Devices and Contrivances

By Newbould, Brian | Musical Times, Winter 2005 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Elgar and Academicism 3: Devices and Contrivances


Newbould, Brian, Musical Times


Self-taught am I, and the god has planted in my heart all manner of lays, and worthy am I to sing to thee as to a god.

THESE WORDS, TRANSLATED from Homer's Odyssey, are those of the Public Orator at Cambridge University: the occasion, the bestowal of an honorary degree on Elgar.1 With this eulogy, academe aptly enough bestowed the accolade of academic respectability on one who never took the academic route to attain it.

In the first of my three MT articles on Elgar and academicism (Summer 2005) I fitted the term 'academicism' to my present purpose by narrowing its scope: it would refer to an academy of music or other educational institution, and to the pedagogical content of any institutional course in music. I retain this definition as I embark on my last article, but will find it useful - for reasons that will become evident - to view a wider spectrum of opinion too. The meaning of 'academic' has shifted and picked up tributary nuances over time. The term appears in the Elgarian literature, and was a hot subject of debate in the first half of the 20th century, as well as subsequently.

To explore its current implications, I sounded out some 24 fellow musicians, drawn from the ranks of musicologists, performers and conductors. For this exercise, views were invited on the meaning of the term 'academic' as applied to a musical work. A list of part-definitions was offered, which respondents were to weight on a prescribed scale. The following elements of meaning found most favour, in the given order:

(1) Showing a scholarly discipline;

(2) Carrying a whiff of the textbook;

(3) Excessively formal;

(4) Lacking imagination;

(5) Without much surface allure;

(6) Rigidly uncompromising in its working-out;

(7) Displaying procedures or structures more evident to the eye than to the ear;

(8) Incorporating the 'devices' (e.g. augmentation, inversion, canon, invertible counterpoint).

Of these definitions, 1 and 8 may be regarded as neutral or positive: the remainder all have negative resonances, or suggest a lack of balance between rigour and appeal. Among further part-definitions proposed by respondents, 'accomplished rather than inspired' was a typical example: another colleague put it as 'craftsmanlike but lacking a vital spark'. In these instances, we would presumably be right to interpret 'accomplished' and 'craftsmanlike' as positives, offset by the negatives stated. Craftsmanship, then, is appreciated, so long as imagination, spark and allure are also present. There is clearly a negative tendency in the way we use the term today, a tendency more marked among our colleagues in the USA.

Graham Sadler added to his reply an historical perspective:

It would be interesting to know when the current pejorative use of 'academic' with regard to music came about. The great Franco-Netherlanders C.1500, with their displays of astonishing contrapuntal ingenuity, would surely have been puzzled by it. So would a craftsman-composer like Bach. I am aware of a shift in 'popular' perception in early 18th-century France. Rameau, for example, was dubbed 'savant' and 'géomètre' by those who could not accept that a learned theorist could be a true creative artist. (A parallel is the British habit of regarding intellectuals as being too clever by half.) In Rameau's case, of course, it was not so much self-conscious displays of contrapuntal skill as his 'recherché' harmony that came in for criticism. Even so, I believe that such criticism was part and parcel of the current shift in the way that composers were perceived - no longer as mere craftsmen but as inspired 'artists'.

In Elgar's time, academicism - with a somewhat pejorative meaning-was clearly associated with academies. 'The tendency of academies to breed academicism is well known,' wrote Parry.2 Academicism was, for him, 'systématisation [...] stiffened into formality': it reflected a point of view that allowed theory (that is, abstractions unrelated to what composers actually do) to precede practice.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Elgar and Academicism 3: Devices and Contrivances
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?