The American Public's Assessment of the Rehnquist Court

By Kritzer, Herbert M. | Judicature, November/December 2005 | Go to article overview

The American Public's Assessment of the Rehnquist Court


Kritzer, Herbert M., Judicature


The apparent drop in public support for the Supreme Court during Chief Justice Rehnquist's tenure may be nothing more than the general demonization of government over the last 25 years.

How did the public view the Supreme Court during the period of the late William Rehnquist's service as chief justice? We know that there have been at least some ups and downs. A 2001 article in Judicature reported evidence that the election-determining decisions in late 2000 differentially affected public confidence in the Court depending on whether the respondent was a self-identified Democrat, Republican, or Independent, although within six months the impact of Bush v. Gore already showed signs of dissipating.1

Now that the Rehnquist era has ended, it is worth asking the broader question of how the public's view of the Court varied over the entire period that Rehnquist occupied the Court's center chair. First, is there any broad pattern of increase or decrease in support for the Court, either generally or within partisan subgroups? One might hypothesize that as the Court moved increasingly toward the right, if that is actually the case, Democrats lost confidence in the Court over time while Republicans increased in confidence. Second, are there any other moments that produced sharp shifts in support for the Court similar to what we observed in the wake of Bush v. Gore? For example, did the reaffirmation of the right to abortion in Planned Parenthood of Pennsylvania v. Casey have any measurable impact on the public's view of the Court?

Data

To examine these questions, one needs time series data in which the same question has been asked of the public repeatedly over time. I identified five such series:

* Gallup Poll ("Gallup"): "I am going to read you a list of institutions in American society. Would you tell me how much confidence you, yourself, have in each one - a great deal, quite a lot, some or very little ... The U.S. Supreme Court?" (31 replications from 1973 through 2005; 21 during the Rehnquist Court).

* General Social Survey ("GSS"): "I am going to name some institutions in this country. As far as the people running these institutions are concerned, would you say you have a great deal of confidence, only some confidence, or hardly any confidence at all in them? ... U.S. Supreme Court" (23 replications from 1973 through 2004; 12 during the Rehnquist Court).

* National Election Studies ("NES"): "I"d like to get your feelings toward some of our political leaders and other people who are in the news these days. I'll read the name of a person and I'd like you to rate that person using something we call the feeling thermometer. Ratings between 50 degrees and 100 degrees mean that you feel favorable and warm toward the person. Ratings between 0 degrees and 50 degrees mean that you don't feel favorable toward the person and that you don't care too much for that person. You would rate the person at the 50 degree mark if you don't feel particularly warm or cold toward the person.... Still using the thermometer, how would you rate the Supreme Court?" (7 replications from 1980 through 2004 during the Rehnquist Court).

* Pew Research Center for the People & the Press [and others] ("Pew"): "Now I'd like your opinion of some groups and organizations in the news... Would you say your overall opinion of the Supreme Court is very favorable, mostly favorable, mostly unfavorable, or very unfavorable?" (15 replications from 1985 through 2005; 14 during the Rehnquist Court.)

* Wisconsin Continuous National Telephone Survey ("WISCON"): "On a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 means very poor and 10 means excellent, how would you rate the job the Supreme Court is doing?" (more or less continuous from June 27, 1988 through May 7, 2002; aggregated into 55 quarterly observations2).

The first two of these are quite similar; the other three differ substantially and may tap somewhat different reactions to the Court. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The American Public's Assessment of the Rehnquist Court
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.