Dissociating Sources of Dual-Task Interference Using Human Electrophysiology

By Arnell, Karen M.; Helion, Alicia M. et al. | Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, February 2004 | Go to article overview

Dissociating Sources of Dual-Task Interference Using Human Electrophysiology


Arnell, Karen M., Helion, Alicia M., Hurdelbrink, Jessica A., Pasieka, Brian, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review


In the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm, two unmasked targets are presented, each of which requires a speeded response. Response times to the second target (T2) are slowed when T2 is presented shortly after the first target (T1). Electrophysiological studies have previously shown that the P3 event-related potential component is not delayed during T2 response slowing in the PRP paradigm, but that the lateralized readiness potential is delayed, which suggests a bottleneck on response selection operations but not on stimulus identification. Recently, researchers (Arnell & Duncan, 2002; Jolicoeur & Dell'Acqua, 1999) observed T2 response slowing in an encoding-speeded response (ESR) paradigm where T2 followed a masked T1 that required identification but not a speeded response. T2 response slowing in the ESR paradigm is often indistinguishable from that in the PRP paradigm, prompting some researchers to postulate a common processing bottleneck for the two paradigms. With the use of the ESR paradigm, we observed T2 response slowing and, in contrast to the PRP paradigm, we also observed corresponding P3 delays. The results suggest that dissociable bottlenecks underlie the dual-task costs from the two paradigms.

When people attend to two targets presented within half a second of each other, performance on the second target (T2) is typically impaired or delayed. In the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm, two unmasked targets are presented at variable target-target stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs), with each target requiring a speeded response. The target stimuli and tasks are typically very simple, yet results show that response times (RTs) to T2 are often lengthened dramatically when T2 is presented soon after the first target (T1), as compared with when the targets are further apart in time (for a review, see Pashler, 1994). Historically, one popular view has been that the PRP reflects a bottleneck on response selection operations (see, e.g., Pashler, 1994; WeIford, 1952), in which the mapping from stimulus identity to the required response can proceed for only one stimulus at a time (for a contradictory model, see Schumacher etal., 1999).

Recently, T2 response slowing at short SOAs has also been observed in an encoding-speeded response (ESR) paradigm, in which T1 is masked and requires identification for a later response but does not require a speeded response (see, e.g., Arnell & Duncan, 2002; Jolicoeur & Dell'Acqua, 1998,1999). For example, if T1 is a masked visual digit and T2 is an unmasked auditory tone, participants may be asked to report the pitch of the T2 tone as soon as possible after its presentation and, at the end of the trial, to report the identity of the T1 digit in an unspeeded manner. The presence of T2 response slowing in the ESR paradigm has led some researchers to postulate that conscious stimulus consolidation and response selection require, at least in part, the same limited capacity processing stages and, therefore, result from the same processing bottleneck (Jolicoeur, 1999; Jolicoeur & Dell'Acqua, 1998, 1999). This theory is in contrast to the more traditional view of separate processing limitations for stimulus identification and response selection (Pashler, 1989). Although response slowing appears to be similar in the two paradigms, it is unclear whether the T2 response slowing observed in the PRP paradigm and that observed in the ESR paradigm result from bottlenecks at the same stage of processing or at different stages.

EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL INVESTIGATIONS

For researchers favoring bottleneck models, the results from electrophysiology experiments have been useful in constraining the locus of the proposed bottleneck in the PRP paradigm. The P3 (or P300) event-related potential (ERP) component is sensitive to stimulus identification and categorization manipulations, and it has been suggested by some researchers (e.g., Donchin, 1981) to reflect consolidation into working memory. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Dissociating Sources of Dual-Task Interference Using Human Electrophysiology
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.