These Animals Think, Therefore

By Small, Meredith F. | Natural History, August 1996 | Go to article overview

These Animals Think, Therefore


Small, Meredith F., Natural History


Indah, a sixteen-year-old female orangutan, faces the computer screen. She is presented with three drawings: at the far left is a dot within a rectangle; in the middle, a rectangle crossed by a wiggly line; and on the right, a rectangle divided by a diagonal line, with a dot at its center. Indah unfolds one long, hairy arm and touches the rectangle with the diagonal line. The computer gives off a reassuring beep-right answer. She is rewarded with a slice of apple, which she pops between her rubbery lips. Chewing methodically, eyes wandering, looking bored, she has to be coaxed back to work with a few encouraging words and a pat on the arm.

This computer business is, after all, a no-brainer for Indah. She has done it a million times-the symbol for apple = apple. Big deal. Her gaze also drifts because for the first time she has an audience: from the other side of the glass a crowd of adults and children are watching her perform. The public is being let in on Indah's secret-that she, a great ape with no language to speak of and a brain about the size of a softball, has the cognitive power to understand symbols.

On October 27, 1995, the Smithsonian Institution's National Zoological Park in Washington, D.C., unveiled an exhibition called Think Tank. With demonstrations by live animals and written explanations about learning and thinking, the zoo is trying to make a point. Other animals, not just humans, lead cognitively complex lives. Chimpanzees fashion tools, leaf-cutter ants navigate through a multitiered caste system, and monkeys are experts at social manipulation. Just like us, they think, reason, plan what to do, solve puzzles. And so they merit respect. The unspoken goal, says Benjamin Beck, associate director for biological programs at the zoo and the initiator of Think Tank, is to make people appreciate the cognitive richness of these animals so that they will be more inclined to conserve them.

But should the zoo use this hook to educate a bored public? People might view these animals, not as cognitive sophisticates, but as performers-they may not wear funny clothes and ride bicycles, but they still must strut their stuff. "I think there is a very narrow line between demonstration and performance, and I'm not sure when you cross that line," says Christie Feral, program officer for the African Wildlife Foundation. She adds, cautioning about all such projects, "By putting their activities into a human context, such as using a computer or demonstrating abstract associations, are we really learning what makes [other animals] unique and adaptable or what makes their lives complex and interesting? And what is it that we are trying to teach people about the animals? Is it that they have an intellect that reflects ours, or are we trying to teach something about these animals being distinctly different but having equal value?"

Over the past decades, zoos have been installing exhibits that illustrate habitatstropical jungles, marshes, desertsand inviting visitors to appreciate animals on their own terms. The snake and the spider are worthy simply because they exist. Think Tank, in contrast, uses the lens of intelligence, a characteristic that just happens to be of great significance to our species, to evaluate other creatures. Beck is aware of the problem in this bias, that after all, "an ant or a slug is just as worthy of conservation as a thinking orangutan."

In any case, the zoo's approach helps illuminate a fundamental question: How is the human mind different from other animal minds? Behavioral psychologists have long known that learning plays a large role in the behavior of many animals. With a few dogs, dishes of food, and a buzzer, Pavlov demonstrated that even automatic responses like drooling over dinner could be conditioned. B. E Skinner showed that with a little reinforcement, even smallbrained birds and rodents could learn just about any task. More flexible responses could be seen at work in chimpanzees: captive apes were able to figure out how to use a stick to rake in bananas or how to pile boxes on top of one another to grab at dangling fruit. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

These Animals Think, Therefore
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.