Separation of Powers--Does it Still Work?

By Robert A. Goldwin; Art Kaufman | Go to book overview
Save to active project

executive as well as their awareness that the prime minister can promote or frustrate their political careers strongly encourages deference to the government. This, however, is not evidence of that total subordination of the majority parliamentary party to the government that would demonstrate the absence of an adequate separation of executive and legislative power in Britain. The evidence, on the contrary, indicates that British governments cannot take for granted the unwavering support of their party followers in Parliament and usually make considerable efforts to persuade and sometimes to compromise with them to maintain party cohesion.

As the experience of Edward Heath demonstrated, a British prime minister who persistently introduces controversial and divisive proposals in the House of Commons without prior consultation with his party's backbenchers and regardless of their anticipated reactions is very likely to suffer defeats on some occasions. 42 Twice during the past century large numbers of government members of Parliament (M.P.s) have been prepared to destroy the unity of their party rather than follow a prime minister whose policies they believed disastrous. On June 8, 1886, ninety-three Liberal M.P.s joined with the Conservafives to destroy William Gladstone Irish Home Rule Bill along with the Liberal government. In August 1931, when Ramsay MacDonald, who had been prime minister in a minority Labour government, formed a new government in coalition with the Conservative and Liberal parties to deal with the country's economic crisis, he was deserted by all but eight of the Labour backbenchers. 43


Conclusions

This essay has attempted to establish three conclusions about the separation of powers. First, as a prescriptive theory of certain aspects of the relation between governmental organizations and personnel, it contains elements of universal validity that no country should ignore in arranging its governmental institutions. Since there are other principles of governmental organization of equal or greater importance, however, it does not follow that the greater the degree of independence of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches, the better the governmental system. An attempt to go beyond what is necessary to realize the aims of the doctrine may frustrate the achievement of other values. When the question is raised in the United States, Does the separation of powers still work? what is being asked is not whether the institutional relations of American government continue to satisfy the requirements of the doctrine but whether in doing so they have weakened government in other respects. Second, both the presiden

-83-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Separation of Powers--Does it Still Work?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 196

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?