Separation of Powers--Does it Still Work?

By Robert A. Goldwin; Art Kaufman | Go to book overview
Save to active project

ring to President Ronald Reagan's military exercises in and around Honduras in 1983, Richard Halloran reported American military officers' private statements that the exercises "would underline the world-wide commitments that overextend the armed forces instead of demonstrating American military power to potential adversaries." In 1973, when the War Powers Act was passed, the global American military involvement was manifest in "323 sizable installations outside the continental United States. . . . In 1983, the total is 359, not including foreign military bases to which Americans have access but do not control." The annual financial costs of American military commitments in Europe, Asia, and the Persian Gulf region were estimated at $212 billion. 73

Something there is that does not love a debate. Our system is not structured to fix responsibility on a government to govern and on an opposition to debate the government by offering alternatives. Congress can impose specific limits on the executive, such as tying approval of a Soviet-American trade agreement to a Soviet concession to liberalize the migration of its citizens, barring arms sales to Turkey pending a settlement on Cyprus, denying most-favored-nation status to members of OPEC in retaliation for the 1973 oil embargo, or forbidding clandestine aid to antigovernment forces in Angola. When it comes to sharing actively in the formulation and administration of a complex foreign policy, however, the War Powers Act may simply help the president in sending a resounding message to foreigners that the country is behind him.

The debacle in Iran illuminates the kind of issue that the American separation of powers simply does not acknowledge. The issue involves the ability to nourish, defend, and improve "fragile client states," as Stanley Hoffmann calls them. We have unquestioningly accepted the responsibilities of John Foster Dulles's extravagant commitments in the Persian Gulf, in much of Asia and the South Pacific, and in Central America. "In all such cases . . . the dilemma is the same: responsibility without actual control, or control at a prohibitive cost and with inconclusive or horrifying results." 74


In his historical analysis of constitutionalism, Charles H. McIlwain dwelt on the government and the rights of citizens established in law, using the terms gubernaculum and jurisdictio to designate them because the theory of constitutionalism and an adumbration of its practice were first achieved in Rome. 75 The history of constitutionalism was manifest in the continuous struggle between gubernaculum and jurisdictio, that is, between governmental order and private rights. "Con


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Separation of Powers--Does it Still Work?


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 196

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?