Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

From Spear to Flintlock: A History of War in Europe and the Middle East to the French Revolution

By: Frederic J. Baumgartner | Book details

Contents
Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Page 219
Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

16
The Sixteenth Century

But the Erench made much more manageable pieces and only out of bronze, which the called cannons, and used iron balls where they used to be of stone and incomparably larger and heavier; and they moved them on carts which were drawn not by oxen as was the custom in Italy, but by horses. The men and equipment assigned to this work were so skillful that they could almost always keep up with the rest of the army; and when brought up to the walls they were set up with unbelievable rapidity. With only the briefest intervals between shots, they shot so rapidly and powerfully that they could do in a few hours what in Italy used to take days.

Francesco Guicciardini, The History of Italy, trans. Cecil Grayson, ( New York, 1964), p. 153. Guicciardini was a Florentine historian of the early sixteenth century.

Just as guns profoundly changed war at sea, so they required drastic changes in siegecraft and fortification design. Guns were in use at sieges from their first appearance, but only after 1430 did they begin to have a real impact on siegecraft. It took another generation before they affected the design of fortifications.

It was in Italy that fort building first began to reflect the destructive power of artillery. The increasing use after 1470 of iron balls, which were more effective in battering the high walls and towers of medieval castles, required a reduction in their height. The lower trajectory of cannon in comparison to mechanical artillery meant that the lower part of a wall was more likely to be hit by cannonballs. That in turn meant that the rubble from a collapsed wall would probably fill the moat and make an assault on the breach easier. Lowering the walls, however, increased the likelihood of a successful escalade. The response to these problems was to make the ditch deeper and wider, so that only a small portion of the wall was raised above ground level. Machicolation atop the walls was replaced by rounded shoulders to allow balls to deflect off without doing as much damage. Gun openings, called casemates, were cut into the base of the wall to aid the defense of the ditch.

-219-

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
of 353
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?