Campaign Finance Reform: A Sourcebook

By Anthony Corrado; Thomas E. Mann et al. | Go to book overview
Save to active project



Nothing symbolizes the funding of campaigns after the post-Watergate reforms of 1974 as aptly as political action committees ( PACs). And nothing better typifies the discontent that regulatory system has generated. For the central fact is that, while PACs existed as early as the 1940s, they reached their maturity and full flowering in the 1970s and 1980s. In the first counting in 1974 there were 608 registered with the Federal Election Commission (FEC), but by the end of 1984 there were 4,009. Within the same ten-year span their contributions to all congressional candidates rose from $12.5 million to $105.3 million. In short, PACs have become the most visible icons of this generation's campaign finance.

The first American PAC was called the Political Action Committee, a name that quickly became the generic term for all of its successors. It was founded in 1943 as a political arm of the Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO), largely in response to Congress's outlawing of direct campaign contributions from the treasuries of labor unions. (Congress had outlawed direct contributions by corporations thirty-six years earlier [document 2.1].) Its purpose--to raise money in voluntary individual contributions for a separate political fund from which to support the interests of the sponsoring organization with campaign contributions--is still the chief purpose of most PACs.

PACs proliferated slowly and somewhat silently until their sudden growth coincided with the first years of the post-Watergate reforms. The connection was clear and direct. Congress in the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1974 (FECA; document 2.9) set the limit on contributions by individuals at $ 1,000 per candidate per election and that for PACs at $5,000. Primaries and general elections each were a separate election; thus the effective limits were $2,000 and $10,000 for the two-year election cycle. In 1974 Congress wanted above all to curb the giving of wealthy individuals (the so-called "fat cats"); W. Clement Stone, a Chicago insurance executive, had set a record in 1968 with $2.8 million in contributions, most of it to Richard Nixon's campaign for the presidency. In its zeal to end the influence of wealthy contributors, Congress apparently overlooked the incentive for collective action it was creating with PAC limits five times greater than those placed on individuals.

PACs flourished, however, for other reasons. The number of interest groups and the range of their agendas exploded in the 1970s. As citizen loyalties to political parties waned, as the party organizations weakened, and as the parties lost control of campaigns to the media and candidates, interest groups became the political organization of choice for many Americans concerned about specific (and even narrow) interests and issues. PACs were the instruments by which interest groups invaded the home territory of the parties: the politics and campaigns of elections. Their rise marked the end of an informal but historic division of labor in which parties had mobilized support in elections and interest groups brought influence to bear on officials already elected.

Finally, PACs grew in the 1970s because the Fed-


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Campaign Finance Reform: A Sourcebook


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 402

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?