Sex and Pay in the Federal Government: Using Job Evaluation Systems to Implement Comparable Worth

By Doris M. Werwie | Go to book overview
Save to active project

3
Historical Development of the Federal Government's Job Classification System

Position classification in its most basic form has been a part of the federal government from its inception. As early as 1789, Congress established pay rates for clerks within the Departments of State, War, and the Treasury ( OPM, 1977:2.1). It was not until Congress passed the Classification Act of 1923 that an attempt was made to standardize salaries across the various government agencies. The Classification Act established the rudiments of much of today's classification process. It called for broad occupational divisions, divided into professional and subprofessional services. The professional services included professional and scientific occupations, while the subprofessional included clerical, administrative, fiscal, and custodial services. These groupings are very similar to today's PATCO (Professional, Administrative, Technical, Clerical, and Other) distinctions. The Act established that each of these services would be graded on the basis of four factors: importance, difficulty, responsibility, and value of the work. The Classification Act also provided that a uniform compensation schedule and general job classification system be established and applied irrespective of sex.

The Act established a central agency called the Personnel Classification Board. At this time the Act covered only 45,000 federal positions. The passage of the Welsh Act of 1928 extended the provisions of the Classification Act to all federal positions located throughout the United States.

In 1932, the functions of the Personnel Classification Board were

-29-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Sex and Pay in the Federal Government: Using Job Evaluation Systems to Implement Comparable Worth
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 190

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?