The Gatekeepers: Federal District Courts in the Political Process

By Kevin L. Lyles | Go to book overview
Save to active project

I am committed to trying to eliminate judicial activism without regard to whether my party appointed the judges or whether I like the outcome in a particular case as a policy matter. 239

Some Senate Democrats, however, have claimed that the Hatch-Ashcroft crusade against judicial activism is simply a smoke screen to block Clinton's second term nominees. "They don't' like the fact that Clinton is president and has the power to appoint federal judges," said Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL), a member of the judiciary committee. "They're out to stop these nominees, and any excuse will do."240 Just two months after the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings on judicial activism began, Attorney General Janet Reno devoted an entire speech to this issue. As reported, Attorney General Reno, speaking in San Francisco on August 5, 1997, to the American Bar Association at its annual meeting, charged Senate Republicans with an "unprecedented slowdown" in confirming judges and with threatening "judicial independence."241

On balance, it is assured that Clinton's second term should provide unparalleled opportunities for making appointments to the federal courts as well as perhaps equally unparalleled partisan opposition to such appointments.


CONCLUSION

Having laid out the presidential expectation profiles in chapters 4, 5, and 6, I next turn to an analysis of the extent to which particular presidents have been able to promote their policy objectives via their judicial appointments to the federal district courts in Chapter 7.


NOTES
1.
George Bush, "Candidates State Positions on Federal Judicial Selection," Judicature 72 ( 1988), p. 77.
2.
See Kerry Mullins and Aaron Wildavsky, "The Procedural Presidency of George Bush," Political Science Quarterly 107 ( 1992), pp. 46, 51; and Colin S. J. Campbell and Bert A. Rockman, eds., The Bush Presidency: First Appraisals ( Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers, 1991).
3.
See Mark Davis, "Writing for a President Indifferent to Speeches," Los Angeles Times, 17 January 1993; and Lance Blakesley, Presidential Leadership: From Eisenhower to Clinton ( Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers, 1995).
4.
Bush, "Candidates State Positions on Federal Judicial Selection," p. 77.
5.
Mark Silverstein, Judicious Choices: The Politics of Supreme Court Confirmations ( New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 1994), p. 124.
6.
Quoted in Neil A. Lewis, "Selection of Conservative Judges Guards Part of Bush Legacy," New York Times, July 1, 1992, p. A13.
7.
Ibid.
8.
Joan Biskupic, "Bush's Nominees Lack Baggage That Reagan's Often Carried," Congressional Quarterly, September 22, 1990, p. 3019.
9.
George Bush, Looking Forward ( Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1987), p. 207.

-188-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
The Gatekeepers: Federal District Courts in the Political Process
Table of contents

Table of contents

Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 320

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?