Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Realignment and Party Revival: Understanding American Electoral Politics at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century

By: Arthur Paulson | Book details

Contents
Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Page 310
Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

swing voters. Now they are Republicans and are being replaced as the swing vote by political moderates. Candidates will still have to appeal to partisan ideologues to win nominations. But they will then have to appeal to the moderates, or lose general elections. Thus, the new, ideologically polarized party system will not, in the long term, tear at the fabric of American democracy. Although it is too soon to tell, realignment of the early twenty-first century may yet produce the first American responsible party system.


CONCLUSION

American political parties have persisted for so long precisely because they have so frequently been capable of change in a changing polity. Nationalized and ideologically polarized political parties are probably here for the foreseeable future, and there will be plenty of time for party and policy elites, and for voters, to practice working with them. Certainly nothing like parliamentary responsible parties and party government will emerge in the United States anytime soon, but the parties of the twenty-first century will not much resemble the American parties of the nineteenth century either. More than the declining political parties did, the new political parties are likely to resemble responsible parties. If so, they will represent an opportunity to achieve the sort of issue-oriented process of conflict and consensus-building that has previously been characteristic of American politics only periodically, during times of critical realignment.


NOTES
1.
Paul Beck and Frank Sorauf, Party Politics in America, 7th ed. ( New York: HarperCollins, 1992), pp. 467-468.
2.
Ellsworth Barnard, Wendell Willkie: Fighter for Freedom (Marquette, Mich.: Northern Michigan University Press, 1966), pp. 480-481.
3.
Ibid., p. 481.
4.
Thomas E. Dewey, Thomas E. Dewey on the Two-Party System ( New York: Doubleday, 1966).
5.
E. E. Schattschneider, Party Government ( New York: Rinehart, 1942), p. 1.
6.
American Political Science Association Committee on Political Parties, Toward a More Responsible Two Party System ( New York: Rinehart and Co., 1950).
7.
See, for example, Schattschneider; and James L. Sundquist, Constitutional Reform and Effective Government, rev. ed. ( Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1992). See also Paul Christopher Manuel and Anne Marie Cammisa, Checks and Balances? How a Parliamentary System Could Change American Politics ( Boulder: Westview Press, 1999).
8.
See V. O. Key, The Responsible Electorate ( Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1966) and Evron M. Kirkpatrick, "Toward a More Responsible Party System: Political Science, Policy Science, or Pseudo Science?"

-310-

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
of 348
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?