end the FERA grant program, the WPA was also a victory for liberals
who had fought for public employment since the demobilization of CWA. These included not only Aubrey Williams, who had considered
federal public employment a "hallucination of grandeur" when he had
first proposed the policy in October 1933, and Hopkins, who had waged
a skillful, yearlong battle within the administration, but the congressional
defenders of the CWA, social workers who had opposed the demobilization of CWA and the grassroots movement of unemployed relief recipients, most of whom supported work relief rather than public
"charity." As Anthony Badger has argued, the 1935 program "was not
a conservative contraction of the government's welfare commitment;
rather it represented a progressive expansion of that commitment, an
expansion long sought by professional social workers. . . . It was also
what the unemployed themselves wanted."123 This reality has been obscured by the sharp criticisms of the FERA's decision to dismantle the
grant program by these same forces; by the New Deal's own rhetoric,
which appeared to be a concession to its conservative critics; and by the
chaos that followed the end of the FERA in 1936.
A note on terminology: The terms public employment and work relief are
used interchangeably throughout this chapter to describe the New Deal's various
work experiments ( CWA, the FERA's work program and the WPA). There are,
however, important distinctions between the two policies that should be noted.
Work relief generally referred to the employment of relief recipients at "wages"
geared to welfare benefits, as determined by the means test. Thus, workers, despite being employed and generally receiving higher benefits, remained within
the existing relief framework. Public employment programs utilized relief labor
but paid hourly wages and pulled workers out of the public welfare system.
Workers were not subjected to income testing and investigation by social workers. By these standards, the CWA was a public employment program, the FERA's 1934 work program was not and the WPA was a hybrid, paying standard
monthly "security wage" but requiring an initial income test. Bonnie Fox
Schwartz has argued that by these measures--and the predominance of efficiency experts rather than welfare officials in the civil works bureaucracy--the CWA was the only true public employment program of the New Deal. In my
view, CWA was the closest to public employment but never entirely broke the
connection with relief. Both the second FERA's work program and especially the WPA paid significantly higher wages than traditional work relief and involved
a less rigid application of the means test. Thus, I argue that all these programs
were much closer to public employment than work relief prior to CWA.
Bonnie Fox Schwartz
, The Civil Works Administration: The Business of Emergency Employment in the New Deal ( Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984).
Harry Hopkins, Spending to Save ( New York: W.W. Norton, 1936), 124.
Kenneth Davis, Franklin D. Roosevelt: The New Deal Years, 1933-1937 ( New
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Book title: The American Dole:Unemployment Relief and the Welfare State in the Great Depression.
Contributors: Jeff Singleton - Author.
Publisher: Greenwood Press.
Place of publication: Westport, CT.
Publication year: 2000.
Page number: 160.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may
not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.