Justice Antonin Scalia and the Supreme Court's Conservative Moment

By Christopher E. Smith | Go to book overview
Save to active project

aimed specific attacks at O'Connor, his annoyance with her may very well generate reciprocal feelings and reactions.

In any case, Scalia's irritating behavior during oral argument and conference is simply one more manifestation of his self-righteous confidence that his views are correct and that he need not participate fully in the cooperative and strategic interactions that produce compromises and stable majority coalitions on the Supreme Court. Whether or not Scalia's courtroom behavior, in particular, alienates him from his colleagues, as Chapter 4 will discuss in detail, opinions by several justices in important cases provide strong evidence that Scalia's strident opinions and individualistic views have diminished the potential for decision-making cohesiveness among the Court's conservatives.


NOTES
1.
William H. Rehnquist, The Supreme Court: How It Was, How It Is ( New York: William Morrow, 1987), p. 291.
2.
Minersville v. Gobitis, 310 U.S. 586 ( 1940).
3.
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 ( 1943).
4.
See H. W. Perry Jr., Deciding to Decide ( Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1991).
5.
Walter F. Murphy, Elements of Judicial Strategy ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964).
6.
David J. Danelski, "The Influence of the Chief Justice in the Decisional Process of the Supreme Court," in American Court Systems, 2nd ed., eds. Sheldon Goldman and Austin Sarat ( New York: Longman, 1989), pp. 486-499.
7.
See James F. Simon, The Antagonists: Hugo Black, Felix Frankfurter, and Civil Liberties in Modern America ( New York: Simon & Schuster, 1989).
8.
See J. Woodford Howard, "On Fluidity of Judicial Choice," American Political Science Review 62 ( 1968): 48-49.
9.
David Kaplan, "A Master Builder," Newsweek, 30 July 1990, pp. 19-20.

-73-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Justice Antonin Scalia and the Supreme Court's Conservative Moment
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 150

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?