Contemporary Questions Surrounding the Constitutional Amending Process

By John R. Vile | Go to book overview
Save to active project

Chapter 7
The Question of Limitations--Are There Implicit Restraints on the Constitutional Amending Process?

Given the Founders' desires to accommodate change, the Article V provisions protecting slave importation for twenty years, and guaranteeing that states would not be deprived of their equal suffrage in the Senate without their consent are somewhat anomalous. Why did the Framers, otherwise so cognizant of the need for change, make these exceptions? What would happen if an amendment were adopted to repeal the equal suffrage provision and the states involved did not, at least not unanimously, give their consent? Should an unamendable provision in an otherwise amendable constitution be ignored or disregarded like past unamendable Constitutions, or is it enforceable in the courts?


THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION AGREES TO TWO ENTRENCHMENT CLAUSES

In addressing these questions, the records of the Constitutional Convention offer at least some guidance. As has been noted earlier, the major debates on the amending process came in the closing week of deliberations. By September 10, the amending provision provided for Congress to call a convention "on the application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the States." 1 Elbridge Gerry, Alexander Hamilton, and James Madison criticized this proposal. Gerry feared that two-thirds of the states might agree to a convention that would propose amendments "that may subvert the State-Constitutions altogether." 2 Hamilton argued that the state legislatures would not request a convention except "to increase their own powers," 3 and that ills would be better perceived by the national legislature. Madison objected to the vagueness of the Convention provision, 4 and subsequently

-127-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Contemporary Questions Surrounding the Constitutional Amending Process
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 184

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?