tax proposals of the owners and of the players. The owners' suggestion to tax
the portion of a team's payroll greater than 115% of the average MLB team
payroll at a 40% rate is expected to decrease the average star's salary by
$412,500. The players' proposal to tax the portion of a team's payroll greater
than 133% of the average MLB team payroll at a 25% rate causes the average
star's salary to fall by only $57,895. These are rough estimates, but they
suggest that the positions of the owners and players are rather far apart. Also,
star players may have a lot to lose if the owners impose their version of the
For bargaining purposes, the owners and players define compensation broadly to
include all player-personnel costs--not just players' salaries. The estimated 1994 figures
commonly cited by the media are total MLB revenue of almost $2 billion and average
team payroll of almost $40.7 million. This implies an aggregate payroll for MLB of
$1.14 billion. See "Hard-line Owners Primed for Their Turn at the Plate," by
, USA Today, March 6, 1995, p. 8C.
In recent years, the San Diego Padres have traded away most of their star players
to keep their payroll low. Despite this tactic (or because of it), they were rated the most
profitable franchise in MLB by Financial World in 1994. See
Ozanian 1994, pp. 52 and 59.
The two teams that would be affected by the owners' proposed threshold are the
Detroit Tigers and New York Yankees. The additional eight teams that would be
affected by the owners' proposed threshold are the Baltimore Orioles, Chicago White
Sox, Kansas City Royals, Toronto Blue Jays, Atlanta Braves, Cincinnati Reds, Los
Angeles Dodgers, and San Francisco Giants. These estimates are based on player's
salaries and team payrolls published in USA Today, April 5, 1994, p. 5C.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Book title: Baseball Economics:Current Research.
Contributors: John Fizel - Editor, Elizabeth Gustafson - Editor, Lawrence Hadley - Editor.
Publisher: Praeger Publishers.
Place of publication: Westport, CT.
Publication year: 1996.
Page number: 154.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may
not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.